http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6462117.stm
he's even got the mini hitler moustache
2007-03-17 05:44:36 · 24 answers · asked by dIsTuRbEd 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes.
2007-03-17 05:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I don't agree.
Hitler was very popular with the majority of the German people where Mugabe isn't. Also Hitler believed in German superiority..... Mugabe is completely self interested where Hilter was interested in an Ideal.
Obviously Hilter wanted to remain in power but not for personal self interest.
2007-03-17 12:13:13 · answer #2 · answered by Roaming free 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, there is no official title of "Black Hitler." Why do you ask, were you planning a career? Someone disturbed like you will not be accepted in the society, it seems only logical.
But Mugabe is a nasty animal, I'll give you that.
2007-03-18 05:48:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does the Pope what in the woods? What the hell does that have been given to do with Mr. Mugabe (different than for what coloration the doo-dah might bypass away Mr. Pope, be it in the woods or everywhere else)? What concerning the Pope - how German is he?
2016-10-18 22:24:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really - he seems hell bent on destroying his own country rather that building it up & taking over others.
Sooner he's removed & put on trial the better.
(Hitler's moustache looked silly - Mugabe's looks stupid - he should be had up on facial-hair crimes if nothing else)
2007-03-17 10:57:14 · answer #5 · answered by David 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler was intelligent, a strategist, popular with most of his people, he improved the standard of living for the German people and wanted a superior race.
Mugabe is an ignorant tyrant who is destroying his country, rules through fear, hated by the majority of people and reviled by all but his closest cohorts.
2007-03-18 01:10:30 · answer #6 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is "the black Hitler" an official position then?
2007-03-17 13:05:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not yet. He hasn't started a world war. If he keeps going, I can see why there would be the comparasin.
He's only a danger to his own people at the moment and just a petty, little dictator, not capable of invading France.
2007-03-17 06:16:00 · answer #8 · answered by rann_georgia 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you think it is possible to compare one tyrant leader with another? They're all the same yet very different.
Hitler did wrong, He's is doing wrong. Comparison isn't important. Containing their tyranny is more important. That's what the people of Zimbabwe have to sort out and not some external power.
2007-03-17 05:57:02 · answer #9 · answered by sana 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course he is. What is happening there is sickening beyond belief. Why dont the U.S.A go and invade Zimbabwe and rid the world of Mugabe and his men. They're hellbent on invading other countries and enforcing regime change ie Iraq, Iran. The answer is there is no oil in Zimbabwe so its not really worth their while.
2007-03-17 09:06:46 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Mugabe is more cruel than Hitler.Hitler was never cruel to his own community or race.Mugabe killed his own people.Hitler will not like the comparison.
2007-03-18 21:52:39 · answer #11 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋