Why Do Lib Dims Cheer Everything Anti-Bush?

Question

Terrorism.
Communism(Venezuela, Boliva, etc)
Stalism
Marxism
Flag burning
ACLU (Cares more about foreigners than Americans http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=At2YwoNCTvohCIBSic5HQnEAAAAA?qid=20070310143022AAPlPhN)
Anything Anti-American.

Answer 1

there libs

Answer 2

Why do you Conservatives always have to throw your supposed "superiority" in our faces?

What the hell are we supposed to say about Terrorism? That President of yours has kept us free from attack for the last six years, and I'll bet he's done it gleefully, just to make Liberals like me grit my teeth in anger and resentment. We have a different way to combat terrorism, but we can't try it because his way is working. It's not fair.

Maybe Venezuela and Bolivia aren't advanced enough to handle democracy. As long as Communism doesn't spread closer to Mexico, I'm ok with it. Let them call each other "comrade" and listen to Fidel Castro speeches on tv. I don't care.

Stalinism and Marxism might still work. Just because they didn't work before doesn't mean we should abandon this approach forever, does it? Maybe some country could volunteer to be a test case, and we can all just watch and see.

Flag burning is funny. Inevitably, the people doing it are so inept, they light the flag on fire, and then realize no one can even see what flag they are burning, because it isn't extended. Then some dum @ss tries to hold a corner of the flag in front of the tv cameras, and he burns his hand. We need more flag burning. It's great entertainment.

I'm sick of you Conservatives. You think you're so smart, just because you had Ronald Reagan. Well, that was 20 years ago. Now you have Bush, and we're doing everything we can to sabotage any possibility that he will go down in the history books as a second Reagan.

We're the ones with moral superiority! We've got Global Warming on our side.

Answer 3

Libs are neither. Libs are professional-selection-- meaning the gov. could no longer make that selection for you. Few people (wachos as a rule) are professional-abortion. Libs at the instantaneous are not unavoidably Anti-conflict both. they are ANTI- Iraq conflict or the different conflict it truly is no longer justified. Libs many times have not come out adverse to the conflict in Afgahnistan. Nor have they arrive out on another conflicts (e.g. Yugoslavia, the position the Repubs got here out adverse to it and somalia too). The R's were anti-conflict even as it replaced into the oppposite social gathering in ability.

Answer 4

Um, Bolivia is not Communist, Morales did nationalize hydrocarbon assets, but I've never heard the C-word attached to the country prior to you.

I support anti-terrorist efforts, just not turning it into another cold war. Its a different type of war, with no nation-state superpowers to fight, so why are we fighting it that way.

As for being Stalinists, which is used to describe politicians/gov'ts that take a hard line, I would redirect that at the Bush administration with their 'my way or the highway' tone. We offended traditional allies such as France because they weren't into Cowboy politicking.

Flag burning as a political demonstration is a right guaranteed by the US gov't.

There is nothing wrong with being against the current political leader. It is part of the 'sacred' democratic process and doesn't that make your lib dims more democratic?

Answer 5

Actually I thought Bush spoke out quickly on the problem with the attorney general. Usually he takes forever to react to things.

Your assertion that anyone but a radical conservative, as you obviously are, somehow favors terrorism, Communism, Stalism (whatever that is), Marxism, flag burning, the ACLU or anything Anti-American is totally ridiculous and you know it.

Those of us who are moderates tend to lean more and more to the left as we see people like you representing the right.

You don't know my mind but you make sweeping statements and assumptions about what I am and what I believe. Of course you are completely wrong.

I find it interesting that the hard line uber conservatives, such as you appear to be, would rather call names and assign what you see as horrible titles or beliefs on to anyone who disagrees with them rather than talking the real issues confronting our nation. Perhaps it is because you know that if you talk the real issues you lose big time.

You have a great day
Peace

Answer 6

I am as "Lib and Dim" as they come some would say, and I'm not cheering the Impeach Bush movement as they aren't after the VP first. There is no way I want Vice President Cheney as President. Not even for one minute. That man scares the bewhozitz outta me.

Answer 7

Because they agree with them. It is not that hard. Liberals are anti-capitalism and anti-freedom. They love policies that make it impossible to make money in a business. They feel that private property rights are meaningless. After all, they give more rights to workers and people suing than those who own the businesses.

They are anti-freedom. Ever see a liberal shout down someone that they disagree with? I see it all the time. They cannot win on issues, so they personally attack. That is all they have.

Answer 8

You clearly have an agenda to promote, so please do it in a straightforward manner instead of lying about what others support. You are free to offer your own opinions, but do not make up stories about what others believe or do not believe in. As for your list of what "Liberals" supposedly support, although your question is blatantly invalid I will respond:

Terrorism - It is Bush who supports terrorism, for example his support of Brothers to the Rescue and Omega 7 terrorist groups in Cuba. In addition his actions have created more terrorism than the few terrorsists his war has killed:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0718/dailyUpdate.html

Communism(Venezuela, Boliva, etc) - Actually Charles Rangle (Democrat and Chair of Ways and Means) attacked Chavez for his comments against Bush. If some liberals support him for giving Oil to the poor of our country, then I cannot see any problem with that- considering how Bush supports price gauging to help his CEO oil executive friends.
(By the way, what is “Boliva”? LOL)

Stalism- What is "Stalism?" ... never heard of it. Is that when you take too long to do something ::) .... illiterate moron.

Marxism- OK, now you are just making things up. Maybe Marxists are against Bush, but as for all Liberals supporting Marxism- that is a stretch and a half.

Flag burning- Actually those who believe in freedom of speech are more patriotic than those who suppress it. However Diane Feinstein and Hillary Clinton both supported bills to make this illegal ... although I will admit, neither one of them is very liberal.

ACLU (Cares more about foreigners than Americans)- LOL, OK- but Bush cares more about us when he supports illegally wire tapping US citizens? You know I am a Democrat because I want LESS GOVERNMENT INTRUSION IN MY LIFE.

Anything Anti-American- You are yet to name one thing, so I guess this is just a throw-away line.

Buddy, at least try to sound competent or you just end up helping Liberals by making yourself sound so foolish (by the way if that is your goal- then keep at it and THANKS!!!!)

Answer 9

When will cons get it through their heads that being anti Bush is NOT the same as being anti American. Just the opposite.

Answer 10

Flag burning is protected political speech, go read the Constitution. If you and your ilk would focus on how to fix those problems instead of how "the stupid libs" are screwing things up, maybe the country wouldn't be in a multibillion dollar trade deficit, a multitrillion dollar federal deficit, and in two failing wars in the Middle East..

Answer 11

Look at how much disagreement and friction exists within the democrat party. The only way they can become united is to make cheap shots at the republican party. I wish more conservatives can be as motivated as the libs.