2007-03-17 04:00:46 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I think clever, its putting a different spin on the way the norm thinks a question will be answered to me thats not aggression :)
2007-03-17 04:12:24 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some carry out a little dont once you sense they are getting uptight they could be like the wealthy persons on the hill you comprehend those i propose dont you those that stick thier noses in the air nicely i gues there is people like that over there too i comprehend what you propose with regard to the English sence of humour it Exists around the area too even crucial usa some even taking Exetreme sarcasm over the suitable
2016-10-02 06:53:09 · answer #2 · answered by gayston 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both, I guess. You need to be rather witty in order to think of something to hit back in an instance.
2007-03-17 04:23:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's both.
An aggressive form of humor designed to shock one out of their stupidity and/or complacency.
2007-03-17 04:14:45 · answer #4 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gets used in both ways.
2007-03-17 04:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Rob 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sarcasm adds flavour to language. It's great for stupid questions
2007-03-17 04:09:42 · answer #6 · answered by dIsTuRbEd 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
undercover agrresion, sarcasim is the lowest form of witt and usually sarcasitic peole are very rude and bolchy and have hidden issues!!
2007-03-17 04:03:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
sarcasm is usually the best response for most questions that are stupid
2007-03-17 04:03:37 · answer #8 · answered by crunchymonkey 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the intellect of the user doesn't it?
2007-03-17 04:09:55 · answer #9 · answered by nativexile 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's just having fun.
2007-03-17 05:14:29 · answer #10 · answered by B"Quotes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋