http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
2007-03-17 03:51:22 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
you know how to tell if a liberal is lying
their mouth is moving
2007-03-17 03:55:54 · answer #1 · answered by 007 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
The congress voted on the use of force in Iraq based on the intelligence report that the Bush administration picked from several sources. The search for weapons before our invasion turned up nothing as did the search after the fall of Hussein. Bush gave Hussein 2 days to step down or be invaded. He could have waited for further searches for WMD and prevented this war. Once he had the authority, he used it.
Reports from several agencies should have been presented to Congress before the vote. Anybody who has followed any history at all of Saddam Hussein would be aware that this man did not align himself with any other country or terrorist organization. He killed anybody who tried to infringe on his dictatorship.
After 911 there was a panic in our government arising from the horrendous responsibility of trying to prevent further attacks against the U.S. and the fear of being blamed in case we were attacked again. Not to mention the fact that anthrax was in their mail. This panic led to many mistakes being made. What would the consequences be if Hussein really did have nukes? Which way would you have voted in their position? Hind sight is better than foresight.
2007-03-17 12:10:54 · answer #2 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't want you to know that. Remember in an election year based on polls, there will be more concerted effort on finger pointing from the left, rather than accepting responsibility or trying to fix anything, Proof again KSM, any good news out of Iraq will be twisted back to the blame game.
Another case in point is the political posturing with the non binding resolutions which even the Washington Post has pointed out is all about votes than political fixes that are for the benefit of the US.
2007-03-17 11:04:12 · answer #3 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"I voted for this war...before I was against it...."
Oh, thank you John Herman Munster Kerry...... You are like a tuna flopping on the deck.
Our President AND Congress acted on the same intelligence information received from several nations that there were WMD's in Iraq... So, why not blame Russia, France, England and Germany? They also provided intellegence they were there.
Lib-tards.
2007-03-17 17:06:50 · answer #4 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes but to hear a democrat talk of it they didn't lie because it's a common occurrence for a democrat to lie.
2007-03-17 11:45:05 · answer #5 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. As a matter of fact Bush DIDN'T lie & the Dems STILL lied.
2007-03-17 16:40:48 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Tom B. took my answer. Yes democrats lie. Yes the republicans lie. All politicians lie.
2007-03-17 10:55:01 · answer #7 · answered by summer love 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush went on the info the Democrats gave him!!
But you're not suppose to bring that up Ah ha!
2007-03-17 10:55:42 · answer #8 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Everybody lies. Just some don't lie very well and get caught.
2007-03-17 11:17:24 · answer #9 · answered by seattleogre 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes many of our Demorcrats would also lie but Im still on their side for wot they say.
HAppy St. Patrick's Day to All!
2007-03-17 10:54:45 · answer #10 · answered by ☼Scientific Athletic♫ 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. democrats were lied to.
2007-03-17 11:21:28 · answer #11 · answered by Vernon 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋