Should people who are actually interested in athletics swimming and rowing ect be asked to pay for their own pastimes like the rest of us?
2007-03-17 03:50:05 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Olympics
It's ridiculous and I'm sure that much money could be spent on more worthy causes than watching public school boys/girls running around in circles and rowing
2007-03-17 04:11:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you able to think of. it could be so humorous. the matters with Suvarnabhumi airport (cracks interior the runway) did a large style of injury to Thailand's acceptance of having the ability to construct some thing properly. If a us of a won't have the ability to construct an airport with out any subject then how can or no longer it rather is depended on with each and every of the form needed for the Olympics? additionally, wasn't it only 2 years in the past that there have been tanks and infantrymen interior the line in Bangkok? additionally Thailand has some thing of a acceptance for corruption - are you able to think of Thai politicans, generals, police, etc. battling over international sponsorship money ? those issues at the instant are not stable for a us of a's acceptance. China is a massive, economically important us of a.. Thailand is a small yet stunning us of a with constructive seashores and people with eye-catching smiles. no longer likely a similar qualification for web hosting the Olympics.
2016-10-18 22:12:42 · answer #2 · answered by porix 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it seems that hosting the Olympics is rather expensive... maybe instead of doing so, Britain could have used the money to buy the entire solar system... (and had some left over!)
2007-03-17 03:55:36 · answer #3 · answered by nikkoj1975 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hosting olympic games involves a lot of money nowadays thats why there is selection who among the countries have better packages to host the games. since britain won over their rival countries they should have better funds and facilities
2007-03-17 04:06:06 · answer #4 · answered by briggs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its going to cost a lot anyway, but thers no point in making the athletes pay directly anyway, they pay taxes like anyone else if the live in GB and if they come from abroad they will be paying a lot anyway for things such as hotels and food, and the olymics going to bring in a lot of tourists which should account for all the loses
2007-03-17 04:34:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
£9 billion
Bear in mind that the Olympics will produce income aswell and will provide jobs and facilities
2007-03-17 03:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by Cookie_Monster_UK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
£1.
Yes,those who are keen should pay.
2007-03-17 04:00:23 · answer #7 · answered by HELEN LOOKING4 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋