Let me see what I can say about this. I agree completely and have been educating all week about ti. Along with a few other topics of pertinent interest. What you must remember is that while women and society were being sold the bill of goods called feminism in the 50’s & 60’s it was only half the indoctrination process. The other half was the dumbing down and the playboyization of males. This was done by the introduction of movie stars who moved the sex act out of the commitment of marriage and let men know it was available from other women. Playboy magazine and free love were part of the process.
As a result, despite advances in the work field for a good number of women, there are serious moral dilemmas that now face us all as a society as a result of this movement that was perpetrated on an innocent public. Kids are behaving outrageously and sexual behavior as well as deviance has soared in the past few years. This is the result of feminism and playboyism gone terribly wrong. This problem has to be faced with intelligence and concern, not name calling which gets no one anywhere. We need dialogue between the sexes. What you see is today the result of poisons fed to us in the 50’s and 60’s. The poison was like a coin: on one side girls were being urged to burn their bras and be more equal than boys, in academic and athletic endeavors; boys were being systematically dumbed down and taught what I call, for lack of a better word, “Playboysism”, the philosophy that women are fire hydrants and men are dogs. Both sexes were made to be disposable.
The introduction of feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media (i.e. propaganda.) to control society. In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.
What I will say is going to grate many people because it is not politically correct, but please follow my logic to the end. We need to remember that for a woman, love can easily include an instinctive act of self-sacrifice. This is now considered a quaint and restrictive attitude but it is as true now as it ever was. That is because such a woman raises a strong family and such a thing is anathema to the New World Order vision for humanity. It is actually an act of defiance to be such a mother.
The entire concept of love and marriage have been "discredited," women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. How much trouble did shows like Friends and Sex in the City create by giving young women these roll models of easy come easy go jaded females who used men like tissues? Girls are programmed to abandon the concept of relationships for the lure of what are frequently mundane careers. Boys are taught that marriage ties them down and that “freedom” from the same obligation that would make men of them is a bad thing.
Many girls are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry. Yet somewhere inside we all know that permanent love is not based on a woman's sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive. Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Midler's movies and "America: From Freedom to Fascism" identified all three confirming what I have been saying.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1263677258215075609&q=aaron+russo
We used to say, "as American as motherhood and apple pie." These communist introduces ideas have deprived many women of a secure and honored role by reducing them to sex objects and replaceable workers. It has certainly unsexed a great many good heterosexual men and prevented them from leading the honourable lives they were intended to lead as head of a household.
Illuminati have noticed that people are malleable creatures who believe what they are told instead of trusting their own reason or perception. To destroy the family, the media convinced women that they could not rely on the heterosexual contract. Media undermined women's natural loving instincts using many nasty mantras:
Men can no longer be trusted. Ten minutes on television and one concludes that men are unfaithful rats, abusive monsters, dishonest scumbags, or all of the above. Women on the other hand are flinty flirty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who want to keep them in their place. All the while wearing killer heels and exposing maximum cleavage and leg.
The media tells girls because you are woman, you remain victim in society as a whole. Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays. So to further isolate women from the traditional family, liberation and narcissism have merged. Leisure now means, time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one's girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids . No more cottage with the kids! They are off to learning Kamps while mother is off to work or spa. The new feminist gospel proclaims that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman.
Sex is not reserved for love and marriage. Magazines urge young women to "put out on their first date, ogle men openly" and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family or how to do anything remotely domestic. Such women can't trust a man enough to surrender themselves in love. Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family. The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one's sense of dignity and self worth. I'm not saying women can't have jobs, only they shouldn't be tricked out of having families if they want them.
Meanwhile, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men stating one did not need marry for sex. Marriage and children are a hindrance. There are beautiful women everywhere and with the availability of porn, many men have forgotten to see past the onslaught of blatant sexuality. Women’s bodies hold no mystery. Instead they hold up an impossible ideal of airbrushed perfection few women can keep up for long.
The wreckage of broken families and dysfunctional people is strewn everywhere
I don’t even know where one begins. It is so relentless from the beginning. I will throw in a few interesting reading sites here as well. I feel as sorry for the men of our generation as I do for the women. We were all duped and we all lost opportunities we never even knew we had. We were a sadly manipulated generation, blind and easily led just by the sheer numbers of us.
The strongest revolution these days is to succeed as a two parent family with one staying home. Then the kids have the attention they need. The Muslim way is the ideal for this. The young woman will choose a career that she can do very well in, for example optometry or dentistry. This is work you can just do a week a day and keep up with it. Perfect for a mother with young children. She can tailor the work as the children grow. It is an excellent system and she has a good career as well.
Anyhow, yeah I agree. Things need to be turned around. The way is to tighten up the family and reintroduce values to our kids.
2007-03-17 04:03:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
Unemployment, racism, gender inequality, discrimation are what are killing moral values and reducing advancement of society as a whole. Feminism is actually trying to stop these imbalances of power that cause moral deterioration through trying to end pornography and the power that men have over women through domestic violence and rape.
Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge or avoid what it deems the second wave's "essentialist" definitions of femininity, which (according to the third wave) often assumed a universal female identity and over-emphasized the experiences of upper middle class white women. A post-structuralist interpretation of gender and sexuality is also central to much of the third wave and helps to account for its heightened emphasis on the discursive power and fundamental ambiguity inherent in all gender terms and categories. Third wave theory usually encompasses queer theory, women-of-color consciousness, post-colonial theory, critical theory, transnationalism, ecofeminism, and new feminist theory.
Third wave feminists often focus on "micropolitics," writing about forms of gender expression and representation that are less explicitly political than their predecessors. They also challenged the second wave's paradigm as to what is, or is not, good for females.
2007-03-17 03:38:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Deirdre O 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
What "moral values" are being killed off? If anything is killing off moral values, it is the lazy parents not passing them on to their kids, and trying to blame the media for their kids doing bad things.
Besides, what was so moral about the way women were treated before feminism came to be? How was it moral to not allow women the right to vote, or to not allow women to get work, or to not allow women to get paid fairly for their work, or to treat women like second-class human beings just because they were female?
2007-03-17 04:15:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by littlevivi 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
I think it also depends what country these feminists live in. Some women in certain countries are still very much oppressed. Where I live, I don't feel oppressed. But I have been to a country where I could literally see it.
2007-03-17 04:10:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by R 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I read here sometimes, my impression of the anti-feminists that post here I imagine as: obese, bad skin, stinky and extremely dysfunctional.
2016-03-29 02:38:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you are right, however, they will all deny it. Why would they admit it? If they did everyone would truly see them for what they are. Then, you get the 'brainwashed' feminists who believe everything feminism tells them.
Now we are going to get Deidre O's answer describing 3rd wave feminism: a bigger more dangerous movement to humantiy and more spefically men.
EDIT
What a coincidence... Deidre O is the next answerer after me! Guess what she's talking about? That's right 3rd wave feminism. Now that's what I call being to see the future!
2007-03-17 03:22:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋