Start by noting that n will certainly be a positive integer. The sum of integers from -34 to 0 will of course be negative, so you need to add a lot of positive integers to get a large positive number like 108.
You need to make some use of the formula Sn = n(n+1)/2, where Sn is the sum of consecutive integers from 1 to n. The sum from -34 up to -1 will be equal to -S34 = -(34)(35)/2 = -595. That means you need to add positive integers from 1 to n that actually has a sum of 595 + 108 = 703. So you need to find n such that n(n+1)/2 = 703 ==> n(n+1) = 1406 ==> n^2 + n - 1406 = 0. The quadratic formula tells us that n = (-1 + sqrt(1 + 4*1406))/2 = (-1 + sqrt(5625))/2 = (-1 + 75)/2 = 74/2 = 37. So n = 37.
There is another, less analytical way to solve this. Starting from -34, you can see that if you add every number from -34 up to -1 and then from 1 up to 34, you'll be back at zero. Then you can just sum the subsequent numbers to see what you get.
0 + 35 = 35
35 + 36 = 71
71 + 37 = 108
This confirms the result of n = 37.
2007-03-17 03:14:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by DavidK93 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The consecutive integers from -34 to n represent an arithmetic sequence.
All you have to do is get the formula for the arithmetic series where the first term is equal to -34 and the difference is 1.
The formula for an arithmetic series is
S = n[ 2a + (n - 1)d ] / 2
In our case, a = -34, and d = 1. Equating this to 108, we get
108 = n[ 2(-34) + (n - 1)1 ] / 2
108 = n[ -68 + n - 1] / 2
108 = n[ -69 + n] / 2
216 = n[ -69 + n]
216 = -69n + n^2
0 = n^2 - 69n - 216
Factoring this,
0 = (n - 72)(n + 3)
Therefore, n = {72, -3} (showing we have two values for n).
Let's check:
Sum of integers from -34 to 72:
a = -34, n = 72, d = 1:
S = n[ 2a + (n - 1)d ] / 2
S = 72[2(-34) + (72 - 1)(1)] / 2
S = 72[-68 + 71] / 2
S = 72[3]/2
S = 216/2 = 108, so this checks out.
For some reason, n = -3 is extraneous and will not work.
2007-03-17 03:20:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Puggy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok, reason as follows:
you probably already know that the sum from 1 to n is n(n+1)/2. So, that's where we start.
Count all the numbers from 1 to n, but we've include too many so we'll subtract them off:
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 34 + 35 + 36 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2
but we don't want 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ 34 = 34*35/2 so we'll subtract it off:
n(n+1)/2 - 34*35/2 = 108
n^2 + n - 1406 = 0
you'll find:
n = -38
and
n= 37
can't be -38 so:
n = 37
check 35 + 36 + 37 =108
2007-03-17 04:09:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer is 37 because numbers -34 through 34 = 0. 35+36+37=108
2007-03-17 03:47:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by s√(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know that the sum of number -34 to 0 will cancel the sum from 0 to 34 so just add the successive integers following 34.
35 + 36 = 71 + 37 = 108, n = 37!
2007-03-17 03:16:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by boombabybob 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
-34 to +34 adds to 0
then 35,36,37 adds to 108.
so n= +37
2007-03-21 02:29:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bubblez 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a+j=p_1^a_1*p_2^a_2*...*p_r^a_r is the top factorization of a+j, with each and every a_i>0, then a+j might have precisely (a_1+a million)*(a_2+a million)*...*(a_r+a million) divisors, which comprise a million and a+j. subsequently interior the present subject, we would desire to have (a_1+a million)*(a_2+a million)*...*(a_r+a million) =6. this implies r<=2. In case r=a million, we would desire to have a_1=5 and subsequently a+j=p^5 for some top p. In case r=2, (a_1,a_2)=(a million, 2) or (2,a million), so for this reason we would desire to have a+j=p*q^2 for some primes p and q. subsequently the sequence a+a million, a+2, .., a+N might desire to comprise basically integers which could be factored into between the types p^5 or p*q^2.
2016-10-18 22:08:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by didden 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
-3 and 72
2007-03-17 03:24:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe because the problem is incomplete.
how many consecutive intergers are you talking? 2, 3 , 4 or what?
2007-03-17 03:15:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by detektibgapo 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes
2007-03-17 04:09:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by homeskillet 3
·
0⤊
0⤋