Conservatives-without mentioning Clinton, what is BUSH'S excuse for 8 months of ignoring Bin Laden's threat?

Question

We all know what you believe is true about what Clinton did or didn't do, but what about Bush? Is there really any excuse that HIS administration didn't take action to prevent 9/11 when they certainly had all the evidence they needed?

WHY DO YOU SAY CLINTON SHOULD HAVE DONE MORE TO GET BIN LADEN, BUT WHEN BUSH DID NOTHING TO GET BIN LADEN IT WAS OK?

Answer 1

wipe the kool aid off of your chin and ACT like a man.

Answer 2

Abu Nida and Carlos the Jackal have been the super terrorist names throughout the Clinton years and that they have got been nabbed. This u . s . wasn't centred on Bin encumbered and why might it have been. He became CIA experienced and funded for a protracted time. besides, the present administration does not actually need to seize Bin encumbered. they choose the conflict on Terror flow on with no bring about sight. maximum individuals will think of the conflict is or could be over as quickly as we've Bin encumbered. once you spend $500 Billion on protection...enable's merely say a lot of human beings have quite some funds at stake and searching Bin encumbered isn't sturdy for company...that's all we individuals rather care approximately.

Answer 3

Yes, like Carter, Reagan, G HW Bush, and Clinton, during their presidencies, GW Bush should have done more in those 8 months to fight terrorism. We *all* should have taken it more seriously.

However, if you criticize Bush for not acting earlier, I hope that you are a strong supporter of the Patriot Act, tougher immigration laws, increased border protection and border searches for people and cargo, increased tracking of foreign nationals in the U.S., tougher military action overseas, and greater funding for the FBI and CIA, because those are among the things that we could have been doing earlier to prevent 9-11.

Amazingly, sometimes the same people who criticize Bush for not acting quickly enough in the first few months of his presidency also cirticize him for the steps he's taking now to prevent the next attack.

Answer 4

What an incredibly intellectually bankrupt theory.
The same people who dismiss the mountains of evidence that led us into Iraq, now want to know why Bush didn't react to unsubstantiated 'chatter' in the intelligence community before 9/11.
How ridiculous!
Let me make this simple for you...before 9/11 NO ONE thought there could BE a 9/11.

Answer 5

sigh.....There are many threats that come in on a daily basis into the intelligence arena. In July or August these threats were raised but there was nothing definite so how can you react or ward off something that is vague? Then it calmed back down. Look at the events of that day and the time frame and the security processes of the day and the history of hijackings and you tell me what you would have done? I think they reacted pretty damn well for the time frame.

Answer 6

OK I won't mention old "What's His Face", but this Administration was basing it's actions on the information that they had received from the previous administration run by "Madam X" and her "Horny Consort" so they saw no urgency. Why do you think Sandy Burglar was in the Archives stealing documents if not to cover up for the "Arkansas Womanizer" behind curtain number 3?

Answer 7

When was OBL presented to your president Bush, Stevo?

Have fun at the insurgency rally!

While your at it are you mocking the Irish Catholics on St. Patricks Day? Not specifically you but you libs or neo-libs in general?

Why use this day for you protest. It couldn't wait till next week? No it was more fulfilling for you all today. Is it not?

Answer 8

Clinton.

Answer 9

What evidence did Bush have? Just wondering...

Answer 10

Look now. You are putting down the Best President that was ever elected of the GOD BLESSED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. OOH. I BURNT YOUR BEANS.