Harsh penalties should be applied, so as to learn the lessons of American law. Shouldn't America make an example of what not to do with this Talicon underminer of the Constituion?
2007-03-17 02:15:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton wasn't convicted of anything. He was impeached in the House, acquitted in the Senate.He never had a trial by jury on a single charge. You might more properly compare Libby to Martha Stewart, also convicted of lying to the FBI.
She went to prison, so should Libby. Hes no more special, and probably more dangerous, since he is actually a lawyer and political animal and should have known better on every level, than Martha, whose previous knowledge and business was that of souffles.
2007-03-17 02:47:13 · answer #1 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
all of us know you're disenchanted that you lover Sheik Kalid Mohamed has confessed to creating plans 9-11 and many different terrorist attacks. he's at present at GITMO and may have conjugal visitation rights so right here's your chance to consumate your love for him. playstation : Scooter receives a pardon a useless ringer for Bubba Clintoon pardoned his felon boyfriend Mark wealthy.
2016-12-02 03:21:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing Scooter Libby did that was illegal, is he was a Republican in D.C.
The Democrats have not turned to political persecution of those that don't agree with their ideas.
Just another step toward the Marxist regime the Dems want
2007-03-17 02:21:55 · answer #3 · answered by Delphi 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bill Clinton was convicted of the same crime.
(But, honey, I noticed that you are hung up on Libby, but don't mention Clinton.)
2007-03-17 02:24:19 · answer #4 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree......felons did the crime, they should do the time.
High gov't officials that lie, and do other criminal acts....need to go to jail. No pardons, no deals, no parole.
That applies to officials in both parties.
2007-03-17 02:18:39 · answer #5 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lieing under oath and obstuction of justics is such a menance what your doing about Clinton who was convicted of the same crimes.
2007-03-17 02:18:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Perjury about a crime that was not committed? Serious crime there. He will win his appeal the trial was a farce and the jury did not even know what the charges were.
2007-03-17 02:44:25 · answer #7 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Purging himself aside, we all know that is against the law. What about her (the CIA chic), donating money to Clintons campaign under her "cover name/co", Should they not better protect themselves......??
2007-03-17 02:21:31 · answer #8 · answered by Cassie C 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh yes, he is a menace. Better watch it, Virginia. He might hit you with his crutch!
http://www.npr.org/news/images/2005/oct/28/reuters/lewis_libby200.jpg
2007-03-17 02:20:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe your question is simply unanswerable. Isn't Clinton quilty of having committed a felony?
2007-03-17 03:28:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋