Is 26 correct on my bracket good?

Question

My losses are
Gt over UNLV
Villanova over Kentucky
Holy Cross over S.Ilinois
Duke over VCU
Gonzaga over Indiana
BYU over Xavier

I picked those teams and lost but I had none of them going to the sweet sixteen this round. Should I give up?

Answer 1

Stay with it!

Answer 2

I don't know, with so little upsets, 26 is not that great at all. Usually, 26 would be great. But I might be wrong. I mean, everyone probably predicted some upsets so it evens out either way. In my experience, about the best you can do in the first round is 27, so yeah, that's not bad, but only thing I mean is there's probably a lot more 26 this year because it was so true to the seeds. Normally, you have to be a bit of a college bball fanatic to get 26-27-28.

Answer 3

i do no longer comprehend any knowledgeable conservatives who have self assurance that. What they do have self assurance, and rightfully so, is that the tax brackets will replace, unfavorably, whilst Democrats choose what tax brackets and expenses would be. i detect it unhappy that a lot of people right here make the declare that the tax fee applies to the full earnings. it is obviously no longer the case, and in case you used the brackets provided in the IRS schedules, you will certainly see that somebody who makes over $300K does not base the full volume on the utmost tax bracket. it is the completed factor of a innovative tax. The extra you're making, the extra you would be taxed common. that isn't the comparable as taxing at a much better fee for all earned earnings. leaping to the subsequent tax bracket skill that common you pays a much better share than those in decrease brackets.

Answer 4

Since you would not lose any extra points in later rounds, if your round 2 picks all move to the sweet 16, you are sitting pretty good. But then again, this is the NCAA's, anything can happen. Good Luck.

Answer 5

Yes. I'm sure the Duke game threw quite a few off.

Answer 6

no your bracket is in better shape than mine