2007-03-16 21:35:36 · 12 answers · asked by John.Nash 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I've read review of the movie from different sources. I just wanted to know different aspects of it.It should be very interesting movie.I'm watch it upon the first opportunity.
and to some of you ...i just asked a ******* question.I didn't ask it for some political reasons.
I don't give a **** if it portrays persian people as animals! It's just a movie.
I'm sick an tired of your political answers
and I'm living WITH these XERXES.
I don't need to go back to them.
2007-03-17 00:54:04 · update #1
i'm gonna watch it*
2007-03-17 00:56:52 · update #2
well honestly what i think is its a misconception of what really happened in greece ? but it is after all, just a movie. it showed true courage to stand up for what's right but at the same time sheer idiocy . if the greeks were that good, why didn't they rule the world? haha (x
2007-03-17 01:52:54 · answer #1 · answered by [theboredone] 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might say it will defiantely be constructive. i think of the media will think of two times in the previous calling any professional-wrestler a steroid infested meathead. possibly now that they observed a tiny glimpse of what it extremely is to be a wrestler, they're going to understand only how plenty those adult men provide to us interior the hoop. interior the action picture, Mickey Rourke became nonetheless an independant wrestler. He did no longer even artwork for WWE and his time table became nonetheless so annoying and he became nonetheless so burned out. I remember his final experience became broadcasted in ROH, yet i'm especially particular something became only independant stuff. possibly the blind media will finally understand how annoying it is to be a wrestler and that it is not basically some "pretend recreation." i urge any wrestling fan to work out it.
2016-10-18 21:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran doesn't like it because it depicts the early Persians as Barbarians
2007-03-16 21:40:18 · answer #3 · answered by tturbod2001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
positive- tells us the famous battle of thermophylae which in the ratio of Sparta to Persian soldiers are 1:1500
negative-too commercial, no such monsters in the real world.
2007-03-16 21:44:51 · answer #4 · answered by i3ever100 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
didnt Naked gun 33 1/3 make fun of that one with the oscars "Clad men in leather with big spears" or something like that.
2007-03-16 21:49:27 · answer #5 · answered by clomtancy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what does it matter, it's entertaining! i mean it's a legend that has a great story. the warriors (the movie) was based on this legend. i've seen the warriors and i can't wait to see 300. seeing it tommorrow!!
2007-03-16 21:47:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Positive: 2 hours or so of entertainment
Negative: $7.50
2007-03-16 21:41:50 · answer #7 · answered by Son of a Mitch 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
+it tells a great story, and it is a masterfully done.
- too many people put up questions about it on answers
2007-03-16 22:28:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the only negatives are that the 300 spartans all died in the end...
2007-03-16 21:45:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
pros: swarthy built men hacking the heads off things.
cons: swarthy built men hacking the heads off things.
2007-03-16 21:44:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋