English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From the Islamic side,there's no compromy with the evolution because the Moslem believe that this world have a creator and not depent on itself to exist. What's your comment?

2007-03-16 18:51:21 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

What ever happened to the good old theory of grammar?

As to Evolution, it is a scientific theory and has some evidence. Not enough in my book, but some.

2007-03-16 18:55:52 · answer #1 · answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7 · 2 2

The man that came up with the theory of evolution never thought that any one would ever believe the idea. He came up with it just to get publicity. On his death bead he denounced it and science has been proving evolution to be a sham for years now. There is not a reputable Scientist that will stick to the theory. They either go to creation, or the big bang theory. The very thought that man came from monkey is crazy, if evolution was true, everything would still be evolving and we would actually see some people at the half ape , half man, and creatures at all the different steps of the evolution process. It is really a no brainer.We have animals in the animal kingdom that would have never have survived the evolving process, one is the giraffe, another is the woodpecker, just to name a few. I will never understand why people continue to try to deny the one true God, and why they choose to go to hell. The Bible says" Professing themselves wise they become fools", I guess that explains a lot of it.

2007-03-17 02:07:44 · answer #2 · answered by gigi 5 · 0 0

The creation story is a religious myth.
Evolution is a scientific theory with large amounts of evidence and facts to support it. Do we have all the pieces? No. Will we ever? Probably not. But even with that evolution is without a doubt a realistic, logical, viable theory.

Many people think of a theory as a guess. In science, a theory is a mathematical description, a logical explanation, a verified hypothesis, or a proven model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition.

2007-03-17 02:51:38 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0 0

If you have some evidence for evolution. I'd like to see it. All I ever hear from the evolution crowd is that evolution is a fact, end of discussion....no evidence needed. The Intelligent Design argument, it seems to me, is irrefutable. It's a simple logical argument:
Premise #1: Wherever you find design, you need a designer.
Premise #2: The universe is full of design
Conclusion: The universe needs a designer.
Either you feel that premise 1 or 2 is false or you don't feel that the conclusion follows from premise 1 and 2. But premise 1 is obvious. You just have to be blind to disagree with premise 2 and the conclusion certainly does follow from premise 1 and 2. So tell me what's wrong with that argument.

2007-03-17 02:10:47 · answer #4 · answered by upsman 5 · 0 0

The Theory of evolution as described by Darwin is just that ..a theory. In science all theories when expounded are tried to be proved. Evolution has never ever provided one example of one species mutating into another. There has never been found one link to another ever found in any archeology finding. This fact was once explained away that they would be found in time and further enhanced the veracity of the theory. Yet to this day none have been discovered and that fact since has been discarded and conveniently forgotten, most people today believe the theory was proved. Just like they believe life has been duplicated and created in a lab by inventing a swamp soup. Never happened and in fact they have stopped wasting their time trying. That's the truth, Ruth.

2007-03-17 02:16:01 · answer #5 · answered by J.W. 2 · 0 0

Science has gathered a great deal of data on evolution. I as a Christian do not agree with their interpretation of that data however and I doubt if many Christians do (although I certainly can not speak for anyone other than myself) Scientists who also happen to be Christians (after the fact) also do not agree with the interpretation of the data. For more information, check out www.TheCreationNetwork.org. as one source. CoreResearch is another.

2007-03-17 02:01:40 · answer #6 · answered by Poohcat1 7 · 2 0

shaiful: Even, Scientists from around the world, from the finest institutes of higher learning do NOT subscribe to Evolution - CHECK IT OUT : Center for Science and Culture www.dissentfromdarwin.org - A WAKE - UP call for a lot of the "educated" on this site.

2007-03-17 02:00:02 · answer #7 · answered by guraqt2me 7 · 2 1

Islam is heavily influenced by christianity. Creationism is the christian myth, it exists because no one knew anything when both religions were founded and for awhile afterward. Evolution is true, and it doesn't really conflict with the ideas of religion, just the specific myth of creation.

2007-03-17 01:59:35 · answer #8 · answered by ajj085 4 · 0 3

If I understand the question...on second thought I don't understand the question. What is compromy?

2007-03-17 02:00:05 · answer #9 · answered by MMM 4 · 2 1

They have no evidence to prove that the THEORY of evolution is true, it is just that, a THEORY and nothing more.

2007-03-17 02:01:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers