Husband's case was closed by Mi in 2005 because of graduation, not age. Now, OH has determined that he owes $9.70 in arrearages for cs. No prob. They also state he owes 3300 in spousal support, that was ordered because he requested visitation of his child and blah blah. As of this month, OH has bypassed the MI court system and placed an order to collect $365.00 a month in cs arrearages (only owe $9.70) and the $100.00 for the spousal support. This order is in effect, because it is coming out of his MI employment check as of this week. Does anyone know a great attorney in OH or how to prove to OH that they are collecting a cs payment extremely greater than what is owed? I am tired of dealing with this state. I have thought of sending the proof of the collection of $365.00 a month for a $ 9.70 arrearage and their collection of to a newspaper in the city that collects the cs to prove the inadequates of cs collections.
2007-03-16
15:11:57
·
4 answers
·
asked by
ooneetoo
1
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
Actually, MI closed the cs case when the child graduated. The child was already 18 before graduation and the case stayed open after 18 until grad. MI followed the interstate order as it was written. His ex came after him for the back spousal (ten years later) when he took her to court for visitation. OH cannot collect just the spousal without cs involved is what I am speculating. That's why they are taking $365 a month for a balance owed (at the date of cs ending because the child was 18 and graduated) of $9.70. I guess until the spousal is paid his cs arrearage will be paid at a few cents a week. Which I believe is very unfair. Because the interstate claim was fulfilled through MI, OH has bypassed the MI cs system. OH sent the order directly to his employer for withholding. I definitely will get ahold of our AG. He is really great at returning emails personally.
2007-03-17
05:17:44 ·
update #1