I'm not saying athiesm will replace religion, just science.
2007-03-16 15:04:05 · 23 answers · asked by james B 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
As far as logic goes...it already has.
2007-03-16 15:06:54 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
No, science and religion are as different as apples and oranges. Science is based on data and evidence and is forever subject to scrutiny and revision if better data and evidence become available. Faith is never a valid consideration in science.
Religion is based on faith and doctrine which may or may not be subject to scrutiny. An idea may be considered a religious "truth" merely because the right person says so. Evidence and data are secondary considerations in religion if they're considered at all.
2007-03-16 15:16:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science doesn't seek to be religion or to replace religion. Science seeks only to find the how and why of our universe. It will never replace religion, they are not at odds. Many religions welcome and are open to science, I think that these will replace those religions that cannot accept or evolve with science.
2007-03-16 15:12:21 · answer #3 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No religion is too ingrained in the human experience over many generations and countries and nationalities.
There have been studies done where having faith is "hard-wired" in the brain and in the mind and hence in the human psyche. It is intrinsic in human nature to believe. Indeed I really think belief is the first step to gaining knowledge even at birth. You have to accept the teachings of your parents in order to learn about life. This is fundamental and basic.
2007-03-16 15:23:41 · answer #4 · answered by Uncle Remus 54 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in all probability because of the fact each and every person is coming to their senses... it is in all probability death out because of the fact extra each and every person is moving into to the sphere of technology, so as that they are understanding that the "good judgment" of religion does not carry. additionally, people may even see that Islam is radical (i do no longer comprehend something approximately that) and reexamining their very own faith and questioning it is merciless. some people must be so busy they don't have time for faith and then they understand how stupid all of it replaced into besides. And with a bit of luck!
2016-10-02 06:20:36 · answer #5 · answered by moffat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never. It is because of religion then there is science. Human nature is curious and adventurous, if there is no religion to lead the way, scientists would not be born. Can one replace his father by birthing him?
2007-03-16 15:08:58 · answer #6 · answered by Ptuan 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nah. Science doesn't offer any ceremony, dogma, or allow you to put spiritual significances on personal events. There's always going to be some kind of outlet for those types of things. I do love science though.
2007-03-16 15:07:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The term "religion" refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction.
2007-03-16 15:07:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Religion and science won't exist...only truth.
2007-03-16 15:08:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the more science begins to point towards God, the less common sense seems to mean to people.
2007-03-16 15:09:41 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Science is a religion(god) unto itself.
2007-03-16 15:09:29 · answer #11 · answered by david b 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋