Doesn't Paris Hilton disprove karma?

Question

If not, why?
If so, who else would be a fair counter-example?

Answer 1

Is she making money or losing money by acting dumb. If you were making as much as she is, just how dumb would you feel.

Answer 2

I don't believe in karma. Bad stuff happens to 'good people.' And good things happen to 'not so great people.' When it rains in a given place, everyone outside gets wet... life isn't always fair, if it were and we all got what we deserved no one would be alive to prove or disprove karma.

Answer 3

She does not prove karma nor does she disprove it. She was born with the proverbial golden spoon and reserves her right to be a total and complete air head. One that proves karma is (damn- forgot her name). The one who got booted off American Idol and went on to win an academy award.

Answer 4

I disprove karma, but the other way round.

Other examples include Martin Luther King; Jesus Christ. You put yourself out for people, and see what you get? A kick in the face.

Answer 5

Nope, she does not... Life is a circle and the things that she does will come back to her. Just because it hasn't happened already or you are not aware of it doesn't mean it's not happening or not going to happen. A whole house full of her stuff including incriminating photo's, her passport and all kinds of other is already on display on the web as a mockery of her life. I guess the guy got the stuff at an auction because she didn't pay her bill at the storage facility... That isn't happening to anyone else is it?

Answer 6

Karma is the accumulated impression of past activity, either of thought, emotion or physical action. The quality of the karma that you gather is not necessarily in terms of action alone; it is also in terms of the volition with which action is performed.

This moment, the very way you think, feel, understand and act, is a deep conditioning of past activity. That's karma.

When there is a clear space between you and your body-mind it is not that you are trying to watch this or that; you are simply here. Whatever karma that is in the mind, whatever karma that is there in the body or energy, everything has become separate from you.

For a few moments, if you experience this separation through the process of Dhyana, you know it's possible. If you can make this a part of your life, karma ceases to exist. Nothing touches you.

If you have an aversion to karma, and you're trying to push it away, in the effort to push it away, you end up building more karma. Once you come to a living experience that, "this body is not me, this mind is not me", then there is a different kind of wisdom and understanding in you.

When you understand only with the intellect, it leads to deceptive states. When you experientially know, it's very different.

A philosophy will give you some semblance of balance in your life, but it does not liberate you from the deeper karma, because you're only trying to avoid it, and in that avoidance you find a little balance in day-to-day life.

But slowly, if a person follows this philosophy, he will become joyless. He will become reasonably balanced and stable, at the same time he will slowly become lifeless. If you bring lifelessness into you, that itself is a very negative karma because you are just suppressing life.

Krishna says: "Hesitation is the worst sin". In hesitation you kill life. Suppression doesn't necessarily mean self- denial. When you hesitate you do not allow yourself to participate in your life; you are neither here nor there.

The ancient concept of "neti, neti, neti" — this is not me — is a process of creating awareness of what is you and what is not you, of what is you and what you have become identified with.

But denying what is happening within you right now is self-denial. If you deprive yourself of any experience, whether it is pain, suffering or joy, if you avoid it, that is big karma.

If you go through it, it is not so much of karma. Denying or suppressing or trying to avoid brings much more bondage whereas willingly going through all experiences of life with absolute involvement will bring a life of clarity and freedom.

Today, in the name of civilisation, education or etiquette, educated people are not able to experience any of their emotions fully. They cannot cry fully, they cannot laugh loudly. For everything, there is etiquette.

With this, slowly, they will become joyless. A deep sense of frustration will establish itself. You will see simple people who laugh and cry spontaneously, are so much more free.

They are less frustrated than the others. The very process of life is dissolution of karma. Every living moment of your life, if you live it totally, you dissolve enormous amounts of karma. Living totally does not mean partying every night or just having fun.

Anything and everything that comes, you just experience it fully, intensely. If one experiences every life-breath with utmost intensity, that one is liberated from the very process of life and death.

Answer 7

Paris Hilton proves that natural selection does not select for intelligence, and that human beings don't always choose the best in their choice of, um, idols.

Answer 8

Paris Hilton disproves Evolution, unless we're talking about reverse evolution, then she might prove it.

Answer 9

Well, she's a *****, and soon, I hope she will get what she deserves (Not death, just anything not so nice). So we'll wait and see if she proves or disproves karma.

Answer 10

have you read gita and understood karma.?
as far as i know, karma need not be a thing you see in this birth.