ok, so radiant red and brilliant brunette shampoos both have names starting with the letter of their color. however sheer blonde doesn't, implying the "dumb blonde" stereotype
i don't think this is coincidence, since there are plenty of words they could have called their "blonde shampoo"
2007-03-16 12:56:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Hair
omg. Your right.
I mean i like there.
Products. But John Frieda
is Stereo Typing us blondes.
but i mean. We have had alot of
Stereotyping with our lovely blondeness.
[[ Like in math , im in accelerated, and this dude is always stereotyping me cuz im blonde and saying im stupid. ]= ]]
So i mean i can understand the hurtfullness. ]=
But like i said we are always being. stereotyped.
2007-03-16 13:02:14 · answer #1 · answered by Kelsyyy(: 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It doesn't imply anything of the sort, I will explain the theory they used to name them.
Radiant, Brilliant and Sheer, are all very similar in meaning, they all can mean something that shines, and gives out a certain look.
A lot of blondes go out an buy these 'glamour' shampoos to make their hair more shiny, and vibrant, but if john frieda were "implying" that blondes are dumb, do you not think this would of been boycotted or noticed a long time ago. These are not new products and the advertising campaign has been going on for a long time.
I can tell from the question that you must be blonde. Thats a business intuition as it can be taken from how offended you seem to be by john frieda not rhyming the blondes products.
The fact is they had already used up the word beginning with B on the Brilliant Brunette range, Sheer Blonde implies nothing but shiny blonde hair.
2007-03-16 13:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by Agility_Bassett 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
John McCain had his palms and shoulders broken assorted situations whilst he grow to be a POW. there is not any telling what share bones have been broken for the time of those 5 years and how sick mended they're. in case you ever see the video of him getting off the airplane after his launch, he walked like a ninety 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old guy with arthritis.
2016-10-01 01:23:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
...or maybe he was agreeing with the stereotype and/or insinuating that blonde's have more fun and figured that specific hair color was in a class of it's own and needed no hype or introduction like radiant red or brilliant brunette...
2007-03-16 13:05:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard! Actually what's more ridiculous is the amount of people that seemed to think you had a point...
In what way does that imply that blondes are dumb?!
2007-03-16 17:02:54 · answer #5 · answered by Brittany B 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I have noticed that too before. Blonde is just as a brilliant color as blonde, ya know? lol
2007-03-16 14:10:19 · answer #6 · answered by Goodbye 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ooooookay
2007-03-16 13:01:33 · answer #7 · answered by KoKo.Licious 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
beautiful blonde what the heck lol
or bad blondes jkjjkjkjkjkjkjk
2007-03-16 13:00:59 · answer #8 · answered by ashipaila 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How does 'sheer' blonde imply 'dumb'?
I have to disagree with you, sorry. It is just shampoo.
2007-03-16 13:03:46 · answer #9 · answered by pancakes & hyrup 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Omg, yeah i didnt notice that until you brung it up lmao. They're steryotyping brunettes and blondeds lol
But i dotn ahve to worry because im not either. I have black hair
2007-03-16 13:09:10 · answer #10 · answered by The Sweetest Sin Princess 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋