These are the same people who believe in the myth of gravity. That's blasphemy! Everyone knows that it is God that is pulling us down! We call it Intelligent Falling. Anyone who doesn't believe in it must be delusional!
2007-03-16 12:49:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by gruz 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Ah, trying to be oh-so-clever, and using the "myth" word atheists use to describe superstitious religions makes you seem intelligent...
Sorry, it doesn't work.
See, this is the "real world." In the real world, concepts for which there is overwhelming evidence FOR, and no evidence AGAINST, aren't myths. They're facts.
In that category goes evolution by natural selection, global warming, and other things for which there is overwhelming scientific evidence. Things that *don't* go in that category are things like god, jesus, and other religious ideas...since there is no evidence of any kind to support them. Sorry, but simply because you call something a myth doesn't make it so -- yes, I know your religion teaches you that evidence is not important, and that you can just give something a lable and that makes it a fact...but that's not how the real world works.
Hey, at least you were right about one thing: Arabs don't have souls. Then again, neither do Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists...'cause there's no evidence of any kind that there is any such thing as a 'soul.'
Oh, and by the way...spelling and grammar are *good* things. You learn those along with the rest of a good education. Try it sometime.
Peace.
2007-03-16 12:59:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are deranged. Who could possibly prove anything about anyone's soul? How have you managed to deduce that people who believe in evolution and global warming and mostly athiests? And how can you present god and Jesus as facts. I would have less issue with religious people if they were honest and truthful. Evolution is a theory, global warming if you look around the planet would seem to be the most likely fact, people may or may not have souls, god may or may not exist and a man called Jesus may or may not but probably did. That's as close to being fact as any of that gets.
2007-03-16 21:48:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by LillyB 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'll ignore the fact that you make absolutely no sense, and answer your question. The answer is, a lot of liberals are atheists. Hardcore conservative are typically religious. And guess what? The liberals also believe that global warming is a huge issue and we're all doomed because the weather is going to start freaking out. See a pattern? Liberals tend to be atheist because they don't agree with God's views of abortion and homosexuality, and they believe in global warming. Conservatives are for the most part religious, and don't believe in global warming. I'm in the middle, I'm a conservative atheist that believes in evolution and doesn't believe in global warming. Well I believe it, but I don't think it's as big a deal as people are making it. It has nothing to do with facts, it has to do with beliefs because neither evolution, global warming, God, nor Jesus has been proved to be real.
2007-03-16 12:58:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by abacus314 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Beacuse mate tglobal warming and evolution have evidence to back it up... we can see evolution happening in sigle celled organisims liike flue all the time and some insects like mosquitos...
Bigger more complex species take longer but the fossils are their and the scientific reading of the atmosphere are there.
Your god are not factual... no proof mate.
You are clealy nuts as nobody has a soul you can see violence and repression as it is and the holy land has always been relgious and violent
2007-03-16 22:08:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see you are nice and tolerant....
I don't believe in soul as you christians do, however I do believe that every human life is valuable NO matter what race it is or ethnic background it is from.
Oh and I'm not atheist.. I'm agnostic who believes the facts put forward for evolution, who has seen proof of global warming (go to arctic Canada - Nunavut and see if the permafrost is thawed in the summer - it shouldn't be and is) and I don't believe there is enough proof to believe in deities.
2007-03-16 13:04:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by genaddt 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have seen the connection to. They are spreading and using the same devices to program people into never questioning it and just assuming its true rather than proving it scientifically beyond a shadow of a doubt.
A. Take over the media
B. Take over the schools
2007-03-16 13:04:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question is erroneous because the assumptions on which it is based are false. Global warming and evolution are real and therefore cannot by definition be myths. God and Jesus have never been supported by solid evidence and therefore cannot be considered "facts". This renders your question completely invalid.
2007-03-16 12:50:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Wired 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
As far as believing in evolution and global warming those people are the ones who don't believe that God created all things and knows all things and has made provision for all things.
Evolution is not a "myth" although it could be seen as one. Evolution is a house of cards built on sand. Check out the Evolution Cruncher http://www.godrules.net/evolutioncruncher/CruncherTOC.htm to see what I mean. Here's the first part of chapter 22.
1 - FAIRY TALES FOR BIG PEOPLE
"Rudyard Kipling, in addition to his journalism, adventure stories, and chronicling of the British Raj in India, is remembered for a series of charming children’s tales about the origins of animals. The Just-So Stories (1902) are fanciful explanations of how . . the camel got his hump (because he was always saying- Humph to everybody). Modeled on the folktales of tribal peoples, they express humor, morality, or are whimsy in ‘explaining’ how various animals gained their special characteristics.
" ‘Not long ago,’ writes science historian Michael Ghiselin, ‘biological literature was full of ‘Just-So’ stories and pseudo-explanations about structures that had developed ‘for the good of the species.’ Armchair biologists would construct logical, plausible explanations of why a structure benefited a species or how it had been of value in earlier stages."—*R. Milner, Encyclopedia of Evolution (1990), p. 245.
Times have not changed; in fact, things are getting worse. As many scientists are well-aware, *Darwin’s book was full of Just-So explanations; and modern theorists continue in the tradition of ignoring facts and laws as they search for still more implausible theories about where stars, planets, and living organisms came from.
*Charles Darwin, always ready to come up with a theory about everything, explains how the "monstrous whale" originated:
"In North America the black bear was seen by Hearne swimming for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the water. Even in so extreme a case as this, if the supply of insects were constant, and if better adapted competitors did not already exist in the country, I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale."—*Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (1859 and 1984 editions), p. 184.
2007-03-16 12:53:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Martin S 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't believe in evolution and I'm not an atheist, but here's how I respond to the other things you said. 1. Global warming may actually be occuring, but we don't necessarily know just how it will affect us. 2. Not everyone who believes in evolution believes in global warming. 3. Arabs are souls, and human too. There is no proof that they are not equal to you or I.
2007-03-16 12:52:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Aloofly Goofy 6
·
0⤊
2⤋