Jesus in the Bible was really Julius Caesar, etc. But it was written the way it was to hide their agenda.
How likely is that really? Or is it just another tall tale?
2007-03-16 09:07:43 · 2 answers · asked by Cinnamon 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The crucifixion of Jesus was unknown among the early church as late as the end of the second century. This was close to 176 years after the church would like us to believe the brutal end of its God occurred. It must be immediately pointed out that the modern church admitted the records of Bishop Irenaues (d.202) created a serious problem. They said of him: “Although of crucial importance in the development of the church’s theology. Irenaeus presents problems of considerable difficulty in regard to details about Jesus Christ”. Irenaeus is fondly described by the church hierarchy as the “depositary of primitive truth”, but he denied a virgin birth, and never mentioned a trial of Jesus Christ, said nothing of a crucifixion or resurrection and claimed Jesus declined towards old age
2007-03-16 14:36:51 · answer #1 · answered by Boston Bluefish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Romans were polytheistic, not monotheistic.
If you believe that then youll believe anything!
2007-03-16 16:16:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋