So a monkey didn't just give birth to a person? Then they all turned in too us? THEN WHY ARE THERE STILL MONKIES?!!!
2007-03-16
07:41:17
·
44 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
you're right... this IS getting old. It was fun while it lasted though.
2007-03-16
07:53:19 ·
update #1
Lady, if your husband is a biology teacher and can't answer this question, he needs to go back to grade school.
2007-03-16
07:54:32 ·
update #2
read karinea's answer, then go through my questions and answers- you tell me how serious I am... what scares me is that there are people giving me thumbs up...
2007-03-16
07:56:15 ·
update #3
I find the question funny. I think it's ment to be more on the light side (I could be wrong)
2007-03-16 07:46:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
lol when i was little I always got stumped by this, the reason (look it up if you want) is because they were not just the monkey then that there are today, just like all the reptiles from yesteryear are not here but their cousins are. and speaking of which we are cousins, no ape, not monkey, just gave birth to a human, that is stupid and out of the question. waay back when all around the world there were different speices of apes, are climate changed, they changed with it. some solwly , VERY, slowly became more human like because of their climate changing and their enemies changing, some did not because their climate was fine. Apes were different like dogs a golden retriever doesn't give birth to a boxer, however they are related. same with apes and us. we are their cousins, yes we once were apes, but not the kind you vist in the zoo. look it up, it is true, as long as you believe in gravity and science etc.
2007-03-16 07:49:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kam 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all...humans did not eveolve from monkey, they eveolved from APES. Learn the diff. there is a BIG one.
Secondly, there were diffeent species in different areas of the world, and only certain species evolved. And most in certain areas cos they had to in order to survive.
So u see, in some places they evolved an in others they didnt and some species eveolved and some didnt, cos they didnt need to (or they didnt have the brain capasity to)
2007-03-16 07:45:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eryn v 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you were made in God's image, does god have and appendix and what is it used for?
Why is there fossil evidence of all types of proto humans going back several hundred thousands of years?
Some species adapt, evolve and depending on environment improve their adaptations. Some species have a fecund environment and don't need to evolve much over time.
If you want to ignore scientific evidence fine; that is why it is called faith and not fact.
2007-03-16 07:49:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by zaphodsclone 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution leaves many species behind. The current species of monkeys could not develop the facility of the tongue and lips to enunciate clearly. Some could. Those that could enlarged their brains with conversation and advanced.
2007-03-16 07:46:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wonder that too! Evolutionists say that need caused us to evolve into humans. Well if that's true then why would monkey still be around? According to them, the fact we're here shows the world doesn't need monkeys!! And if monkeys are here and we humans - the evolutionized outcome of monkeys - are here then where are the in-between "evolvers"? (No, democrats and liberals don't count!!!)
2007-03-16 07:47:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Better come up with a new, and brighter line. Do some reading about evolution, you'll be amazed and enlightened. Something for your tiny brain to ponder in the mean time.......If God made man from dirt, why is there still dirt?
2007-03-16 07:47:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Didn't we cover this? We did not come from monkeys. We share a common ancestor with apes. Evolution moves very slowly, it would not be a case of one day a monkey giving birth to a human.
And I beg you, please run a spell check. Evolutionist is not a word, and neither is "monkies".
2007-03-16 07:45:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
For Christ's sake, if you're going to criticize the theory, try actualy READING something about it first. We didn't evolve from monkeys, but from an earlier species, from which monkeys ALSO evolved.
Just for the record, if God gave us free will and the ability to sense and learn from our surroundings, why did he leave al this wonderful scientific evidence of something that "didn't exist", as you seem to think? Did he intentinally deceive us? If som, you're calling God a liar! Boy, will he be PISSED at YOU!
2007-03-16 07:45:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dim 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Oh man, I think I'll need to get in on this drinking game. Damnit! Why'd you have to ask this while I'm at work? Are you trying to get me fired for drinking on the job?
2007-03-16 07:46:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Xindy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋