so what do you thik of the "lost tomb of Jesus"tv show ?seen it ?

Question

www.visiontv.ca/thetomb I am not part of it , just curious of any comments ...

Answer 1

Hello Robert...and to answer your question...yes I have seen this documentary.
In my own opinion, I thought that this show was very interesting and it makes one ponder on whether it's "fact or fiction" or one of those series classic "Believe It or Not". The producer of this documentary was just trying to explain on what "could be" scenerio. It didn't say it was actually the "true Jesus Christ". Archeologists had found this tomb back in the 1980's and when they moved the "boxes" so do speak, alot of artifacts and evidence either had been destroyed or lost. Now they had taken DNA samples from a couple of "boxes" and it had been proven that the two were not of a biological origin that the two skeletons were either husband and wife or a "couple". Also what I found interesting were the names engraved on the "boxes". One stating "Jesus son of Joseph" and another "Judah son of Jesus" and yet another "Maria" and another "Mariamne" which they believe to be is "Mary Magdelena" which could possibly be her. I have an open mind to where I believe that "anything is possible" but it won't change my beliefs in God or my Savior "Jesus Christ". So what if He was married?! Whom am I too judge? Jewish men had the right to get married, why not Jesus? Mary was a faithful follower of Jesus so why couldn't Jesus have married her? The only person He had to answer to was His Father (God). So the remaining question here is...Is this the remains of the actual Jesus Christ? I don't believe that they will ever be able to prove this in my opinion. They can speculate and assume the identity but without the DNA from one or both parents this isn't going to happen. I don't think that God will offer His DNA do you? NOT! and the scientists can't or won't be able to prove that the "box" containing the remains of "Maria" or the "Holy Mary" is really her. So...in my conclusion...it's a very interesting program and it makes one wonder but to be frank...that will be a mystery of all time without any answers. Have a Blessed day!

Answer 2

The crucifixion of Jesus was unknown among the early church as late as the end of the second century. This was close to 176 years after the church would like us to believe the brutal end of its God occurred. It must be immediately pointed out that the modern church admitted the records of Bishop Irenaues (d.202) created a serious problem. They said of him: “Although of crucial importance in the development of the church’s theology. Irenaeus presents problems of considerable difficulty in regard to details about Jesus Christ”. Irenaeus is fondly described by the church hierarchy as the “depositary of primitive truth”, but he denied a virgin birth, and never mentioned a trial of Jesus Christ, said nothing of a crucifixion or resurrection and claimed Jesus declined towards old age

Answer 3

circulate precise forward and watch and enjoy lost replaced into quite voted the style one million kinfolk risk-free television prepare of their first season their is a few minimum sexual content cloth even in spite of the shown fact that it in no way final long and its customarily in basic terms kissing it is going to be high quality for any 13 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old

Answer 4

No, I hate watching that stuff. It takes two hours to get the to the part you want to see and that part only last about a half hour--if that long.

Answer 5

I'm from Texas. The janitor at my work is named Jesus (he has it written on his broom). His mom's name is Maria. His dad's name is Jorge. Coincidence? I don't think so!

Answer 6

satan will try anything to disprove Jesus amazing isnt it remember anybody against JESUS is an antichrist they were alive and well at His crucifixion nothing has changed

Answer 7

Nopes.

Answer 8

I thought "Titanic" was much more fun.

Answer 9

Seen it, but don't believe what those jewish people have to say.