2007-03-16 03:27:19 · 7 answers · asked by david m 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Engineering
i can almost bet you money that we wont
2007-03-16 03:29:18 · answer #1 · answered by slipperypickle 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've heard (I'm ex-pat so my information is second-hand) that the projected savings are based on 30-year-old data. Obviously energy usage patterns have changed tremendously since then.
Won't there be increased usage for air conditioning this way? Part of the reason why ozone spikes can be so high in hot weather is because everyone turns on their air conditioning.
2007-03-16 03:54:46 · answer #2 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll assume you mean "forward 3 weeks EARLY"
There will be a tiny reduction. It was a feel good exercise for Congress but not meaningful.
2007-03-16 03:30:44 · answer #3 · answered by Joan H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in Canada but apparently in the United States...
2007-03-16 03:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Molpatrol 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i heard that because of this, we will have saved $400 billion by the year 2012.
2007-03-16 03:34:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no the opposite gas and electric always increase no matter what
2007-03-16 03:47:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in costs, but in consumption.
2007-03-16 03:29:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋