English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hi,
which developed nations haven't signed the kyoto protocel yet, except the USA. It may be not right but I remember that australia may be not sign. else ?
if possible, source.
thanks and have a nice day...

2007-03-16 03:26:23 · 6 answers · asked by Enis T 1 in Environment

6 answers

It's Australia. Russia was the only other hold-out, but they signed in 2005.

China is a signatory, but is not considered a developed country by the Kyoto protocol. If they had been subject to the same requirements as developed countries, it's unlikely that China would have signed on at that time.

2007-03-16 03:51:50 · answer #1 · answered by kevinb 2 · 2 0

The U.S. Environmental protection corporation (EPA) has been engaged on environmental complications considering that 1972. Air and water pollution is a lot more beneficial useful than that's been. It takes more beneficial than the united states to do some thing about the international's environmental complications. that's some thing that should be finished by ability of each body global. All countries can do some thing to help, no count number what their monetary or political status is. The Kyoto settlement is in undemanding words slightly of the pie. Why do not different countries do some thing about different environmental topics? there's a difficulty with the quantity of methane made from elephant and rhino dung, different countries nevertheless have raw sewage operating down their streets, nuclear mess united statesensue in different countries, ocean dumping is a difficulty in different countries, radioactive wastes are a difficulty in different countries, and so on. Why do human beings always look to the united states for help?

2016-12-02 02:21:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

10 points for Kevinb, although a few other countries (like Taiwan) haven't signed. Mostly they're small and undeveloped.

We now know a lot more. We need a new treaty and we need to get everyone to sign.

2007-03-16 04:23:38 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 7 · 0 0

If it is Australia, (like that matters) with a population in total less than California.
China might be the other one.

2007-03-16 03:40:16 · answer #4 · answered by ButwhatdoIno? 6 · 0 0

If we had signed it and intended to cut our fuel by 30% how would that affect u. The poor people would just be able to walk. There is no need to cut your own throat.

2007-03-16 03:32:15 · answer #5 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

I would recommend seeing the 'wikipedia' entry on this. It's concise and I don't have to re-type it here!

2007-03-16 03:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by just_want_2b_loved 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers