2007-03-16 00:19:20 · 12 answers · asked by Robert S 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
dullshit I was just trying to be nice.
2007-03-16 00:26:49 · update #1
Tyhere really isn't one or any that exist. At best most everyone then is skewed to the right or left, pro Arab, pro Muslin, pro US, etc..... Web site and new article are skewed to the writers prospective. If you want teh real deal... make the trip. My method is taing in things from both side and as many venues as possible... toss it in a hat and see what makes sense. Draw your own conclusions from teh facts. By looking at many sources you figure out what the facts are.... most every source will provide facts... it's just the things they add to them to seensationalize them that skew teh report.
2007-03-16 00:29:51 · answer #1 · answered by tcatmech2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in case you had requested me when we first entered Iraq and Bush replaced into utilizing this entire they are progression guns crap, i'd have suggested for the oil. somewhat we've all been paying double in gasoline expenditures, i replaced into hoping to start up getting that for like 25 cents a gallon. Then i'd were fairly satisfied about the conflict, in spite of if i did not agree w/it. Oh wait, the U. S. were given attacked, and we had to wrestle the terrorists, so we invaded Iraq...and targeted on the incorrect united states. Its a secret yet hasn't virtually each thing Bush has executed been basic as well? i definitely imagine he had to end what his father had all started w/Saddam and used the terrorist attacks as an excuse to also invade Iraq. His associates and fam have made fairly some money even if.
2016-11-25 23:33:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think even with all the bullshit from the general media, you can pretty much read between the lines and see what is going on there. I think regardless of what news source you find the news is generally going to be the same...it aint pretty, then there's fox news, you'll get the Bush version of what's going on in Iraq.
2007-03-16 02:22:05 · answer #3 · answered by huckleberry1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I normally get unbiased news from the web sites of Christian Science Monitor and the Associated Press. Sometimes I also look at BBC News.
2007-03-16 00:29:25 · answer #4 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, try Pat Dollards site, he's seen the truth out there.
2007-03-16 03:28:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Road Warriors answer. Unbiased news from Christian Science.
LOL ............. I havent heard an oxymoron like that since the phrase 'Army Intelligence'
2007-03-16 00:39:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.epic-usa.org/Default.aspx?tabid=424
2007-03-16 00:45:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thank God you didn't say bull. You sure were smart to beat the Yahoo censoring system- which is bullshit.
2007-03-16 00:23:35 · answer #8 · answered by joey k 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
get in goggle and ask for any country you want, their newspapers, and at least read head lines
2007-03-16 00:26:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lol, your as bad as the wacko rt wingers.
2007-03-16 00:22:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋