English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have no experience on international law issues, just a desire to know why the look alikes that also held power with the actual Hussein didn't also end up in court. I also wonder what any presidential candidate would answer such a question, possibly worded more journalistically more savy.

2007-03-15 21:42:57 · 7 answers · asked by little kiss from the sun 2 in Politics & Government Politics

His use of look alikes was a major military strategy. They were considered to also be the the king or whatever they called him. As in accessory to murder type cases.

2007-03-17 13:14:55 · update #1

7 answers

Looking like someone doesn't convey actual "power" to anyone.

2007-03-15 21:45:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Convicted and executed of what crime?

For having the same physical features as a criminal?

Maybe I'm missing something, but what actions did these individuals do that was criminal, other than look like Saddam?

Also, as a side note, there is no such thing as "world law". Each country makes it own laws. The closest you have to some sort of international law are the various treaties that countries have adopted with each other. But even those are only binding on the individual countries that have adopted them.

2007-03-15 21:46:35 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 0

what's the factor of killing Saddam? he will die clearly by using himself in some years besides - in all probability until now Bush and Blair expire. could not we learn something from background, at the same time with Napoleon after Waterloo? The British government appeared lots smarter back then than that gruesome dogs sitting in No. 10 in recent times. Killing Saddam does not make issues suited for the dogs and its proprietor, nor would it not wash off their bloody paws and hands. that's no Hollywood action picture with fake blood and fake bullets. Please think of two times once you come to a kind to help the killing of yet yet another man or woman. For whilst Saddam dies, 1000's or perhaps 1000's of harmless Iraqi civilians would be killed besides. Are your little little ones going to be between them? would you care greater in the event that they have been uncovered to such possibility? This war became into began with out the permission from the United countries. Saddam became into purely protecting his country against the unlawful invaders whilst he became into captured. he's a bad guy who killed his very own country adult men; inspite of the undeniable fact that there's no information that he subsidized terrorism to harm usa of america nor the united kingdom. Is Iraq greater useful now than 4 yeas in the past? whilst the jap Imperial military invaded China interior the 1930's, additionally they suggested they had to "launch" China. They ended up killing greater chinese language civilians than the six million Jews killed by using Hitler's S.S. Guards. Why the human beings did not execute the Empror of Japan whilst they captured Tokyo on the tip of international war 2?

2016-12-18 15:03:57 · answer #3 · answered by rocca 4 · 0 0

The one who was killed was one of such lookalikes. The real Saddam may be somewhere in Guantanamo. this is also a possibility

2007-03-15 21:55:58 · answer #4 · answered by sreekrishnakrupa 2 · 0 2

I think Saddam killed them before they could convince the Iraqi people they were him.

2007-03-15 21:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1 0

They were hubted and killed by USA troops on direct commands from Bush the war criminal earlier.

2007-03-15 21:47:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Walther Matthau was already dead

2007-03-16 00:26:38 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers