English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-15 19:22:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment

10 answers

Back in the 1600's colonists introduced farming to the Amazon. In order to get enough soil to farm, they used the "slash & burn" method to remove all the vegetation from the area. Unfortunately, rainforest soil is typically very poor, and the Amazon's is no different. Crops can't survive more than a few seasons before the ground runs out of nutrients.

If a poor farmer's crops die, in almost all cases he will move on to the next patch of "available" land. In this case, by "available" we mean "occupied by rainforest." So one farmer might be responsible for the loss of tens of acres in his (or her) lifetime.

If you count up the number of people doing this, it really adds up. On average for the past three decades, the Amazon has lost 20,000 square kilometers a year. 20,000! If you think any forest is large enough to survive that, think again. If things don't get better soon, there may not be an Amazon rainforest by the end of the century.

2007-03-15 19:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by Alex 2 · 1 0

a lot of rain forrests are in danger because the thin top layer of soil is very fertile

expanding populations and expanding farming ,that has to keep pace with the expanding populations are very strong forces that encroach upon the rainforest's
clearing them for farming and settlement areas .

In Mexico is a famous jungle that the Media has been trying to save for years
the Naturists ,and the government ,keep watch .laws are made for protection the wild and to forbid logging.
TV put out a series of documentaries
there are campaigns in the News papers
and all of this has not made the slightest difference

Rainforest's always are in third world countries and always in third world countries corruption and the need for money s highest

the jungle gets smaller by the day
more and more farmers move in .and burn the trees
it is an impossible situation
as long as there is poverty in these regions the destruction will continue

2007-03-15 21:26:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

cause it aint that big anymore. not that wet. and not much the forest it used to be. funny how just about any sentence can be finished with endangered these days. well not that funny but true. Hey did you here about the humans, yea theyre endangered. and the earth and the air and the water and the polar bears and the ice and the......................and so on. pick something its endangered. my bank account. its all going to pot.

2007-03-15 19:35:19 · answer #3 · answered by Wattsup! 3 · 1 0

It's due to the out of control logging that's going on and has slowly but ever so surely been destroying a very old and extremely vital, to the Earth's survival, habitat.

2007-03-15 19:36:36 · answer #4 · answered by Kay P 3 · 0 0

Because people keep burning it to make room for farmland and roads.

2007-03-15 19:30:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

wow u r blind to the world arent you
CAPITALISM
people make money off it by cutting down trees which in turn screw with the enviornment
look it up

2007-03-15 19:29:47 · answer #6 · answered by Sam S 1 · 1 0

Are you kidding? All that wood is just sitting there and the lumber companies want to sell it.

2007-03-15 19:34:15 · answer #7 · answered by MissWong 7 · 1 1

because people keep bloody choppin it down.

2007-03-15 19:34:16 · answer #8 · answered by Professor Kitty 6 · 3 0

Because they cut it down.


Duh.

2007-03-15 20:23:43 · answer #9 · answered by Simon 3 · 0 0

greed

2007-03-15 19:26:02 · answer #10 · answered by chi 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers