English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As many of you probably already know researchers recently found a tomb that is suspected to be that of Jesus because of the name on the individual coffins I suppose. The names I believe said Judas son of Jesus, Jesus son of Joseph, and Mary. However what you may not know is that when the Roman Empire first converted to Christianity is that they held a conference for times of holidays and what to put in the bible. They chose passages for the bible that would prove Jesus to be more divine to help the church in its war on other religions. When they chose holiday dates they accomadated their holidays to the religions they conquered such as Jesus was supposedly born in the middle of March, but we celebrate his birthday in December which is the major holiday of many of the pagan (paganism is not satanism but the belief in many gods) religions to help their conversion to Christianity. I think that the Church feels a lessening in Jesus' divinity lessens their power over many people.

2007-03-15 18:39:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

I don't think that it does, because most enlightened Christians that I know understand that the ascension was "spiritual," and not physical, so if they found his body and that he had a child, that's ok.

I do think that the church doesn't want anyone to know, because of the reasons that you have stated, but most people are smarter than that. Those who aren't will deny it to the very end.

2007-03-15 18:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0 4

If you "suspect" what you are speaking of is true (coffins w/inscribed names) then surely you must be wondering who or what is occupying the fleshly body of a person claiming to be "Jesus" in Houston, TX. He claims to be the son of God and the Anti-Christ rolled up in one! He also has a wife, but I don't think her name is Mary...but...maybe his first wife was (he's been married twice). I don't know about you but somebody from Hollywood should be grabbing some cameras, hiring a well known director and heading out to Houston. Maybe on the pilgrimage they can stop, interview and document all those sightings of Jesus, Mary and Elvis on potato chips, tortillas, toast, coffee stains, tree trunks etc. etc. etc...hey Michael Moore are you busy???

2007-03-16 03:34:49 · answer #2 · answered by Mrs. Mojo Jojo 3 · 0 0

Well the Christians don’t have a problem with the doctrine of the father in heaven impregnating a human to have a child, so I don’t know why they have such a problem with Jesus doing the same.

According to the gnostic scriptures, it doesn’t mention any child, but it sure does mention kissing Mary Magdalene on the mouth often. But that’s ok since they knew he was an enlightened man and nothing more.

2007-03-16 01:49:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, it would make no difference in his divinity, he was born human and Divine, why wouldn't the human side take a wife? His private life would be none of my business. Jesus is my church and I don't want the hold he has over me reduced.

You have been hoaxed that is not Jesus' tomb don't be so gullible. It is laughable.

2007-03-16 01:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by Angelz 5 · 0 0

As You should already know that was debunked so many times one can not count,the tomb was found in 1980. It has
also been shown that the one they twisted the words around to look as though they said Mary Magdalene was actually two people a Mary and a Martha.100% fake.

2007-03-16 01:45:05 · answer #5 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 1 1

Nonsense. Again God is the director of His own affairs, not man. He oversaw His Word and brought it to us through time to present day. I don't know who they found in that tomb but those names were common in the days of Jesus. But whoever is entombed there it is NOT Jesus Christ - God the Living Son. THAT Jesus walked out of His tomb some 2,000 years ago and took His bones with Him inside a living, breathing, eating, talking, flesh, touchable body.

2007-03-16 01:50:02 · answer #6 · answered by wd 5 · 0 1

Jesus was not married and Jesus did not have children. The claims of this tomb being Jesus' tomb are not valid. Don't just believe every Tom, Dick and Harry who have a camera and make ridiculous claims.

2007-03-16 01:44:58 · answer #7 · answered by Esther 7 · 2 1

Listen UP and Listen good---Jesus did NOT have any children!
Jesus was never married and did not father any children period!
Jesus never sinned. Jesus is God!

2007-03-16 01:48:06 · answer #8 · answered by zoril 7 · 0 1

According to jew scholars, Jesus had couple kids with few women friends / associates.

2007-03-16 01:46:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes now they'll need an extra 2% for child support

2007-03-16 01:43:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers