English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and yes it directly correlates with that of immigration as well.
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/articles/ConstitutionalLawyers.html
What is your opinion?

2007-03-15 17:01:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

Come on guys connect all of the dots.

2007-03-15 17:04:10 · update #1

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/printindividualProfile.asp?indid=2212

2007-03-15 17:04:57 · update #2

If thats what you want.

2007-03-15 17:06:34 · update #3

Mr. mark: And exactly which professors would those be .....sir. Be very careful of what you step upon here. And yes i would like names not your rhetorical nonsense.

2007-03-15 17:20:04 · update #4

9 answers

Well,I really wasnt to concerned with immigration even though I had known they were a drain on America's system till around the time I heard about LaRaza.Since then I have gotten very involved in this issue.Sadly the more I learn the more I realize how bad the cituation really is.

2007-03-15 17:18:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I have no doubt whatsoever that the likes of La Raza, etc...are strategically influencing/taking hold of the economic and political powers in this country. Just look at how many once towns/cities have become havens of gangs/drug dealing/prostitution by these illegals and their cousins.
I am certain that their agenda is to slowly shift the legislation's so that these bandits could run the U.S. like the bloody cartels that they all have something to do in their lawless, corrupt as hell, poorer than dirt countries.
What's most laughable about the lillegals that these organizations are made of, is that these so called " Warriors" will end up being exploited and enslaved to no end just like what they had been before they fled their own countries.

2007-03-16 06:53:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It is a bunch of BS! Our ELECTED officials are playing both sides and it is getting me sick.

One side they say...oohhh, 9/11, we will protect you...spend trillions of dollars in a war that should never have happened on created Intel that has stressed our military beyond belief going on their 3rd tours only to be extended.

Then on the other...they are butt k*ssing Mexico's president and leaving the border wide open all the while letting illegal aliens do what they want to, to these United States.

My opinion is that we need to look to the Constitution to stop the NAU from happening. We live in a Republic and Bush is not a dictator, no matter how much he WANTS to be.

2007-03-16 12:41:40 · answer #3 · answered by hera 4 · 1 0

Alot. If it wasn't for the illegal immigration issue it probably would have slipped by me.

I'm totally against it, but lately what Americans want doesn't seem to matter anymore. So many of our own congressmen and senators weren't famaliar with it. I don't know how they think they are going to pull this off.......unless they open those southern borders even more and Americans start fleeing to Canada for some sanity. I think they hoped it would slide through without much noise about. But they are wrong. It's the only reason I can see for why Bush is so intent on kissing up to Mexico. All I know is we would end up loosing the most.

2007-03-16 00:11:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

it's all abunch of crap. here's one for ya. the author of the 14th amendment, Rep, john A Bingham(oh), responded to the above declaration as follows. ' I find no fault with the introductory clause, witch is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born with in the jurisdiction of the united states of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of our constatution itself, a natural born citizen.
what does that mean? the language of our constatution itself? to me, i take it as english. our constatution was written in english and there fore our national language is english. and anyone who can not give up their home country for their new country is not a united states citizen, there fore their anchore baby is not either. they have no rights according to the constatution of the united states.

2007-03-16 00:35:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Remember to consult academic journals as well when researching, a lot of professors (at the university level) will not accept most web-based commentary/documents.

2007-03-16 00:07:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I am adamantly against the SPP. We would derive no benefit whatsover.

2007-03-16 00:13:29 · answer #7 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 4 0

when researching. please use more then one source and make sure that your sources also have good sources (ie PhD in Psychology when researching mental health and not when researching weather.

2007-03-16 00:04:33 · answer #8 · answered by themoodyspacecadet 2 · 1 3

life is real, words aren't

2007-03-16 00:32:18 · answer #9 · answered by Moonshadow 3 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers