what comes first?? end of world by war or pollution/global warming?

Question

will global warming be the end of us or will we have a nuclear war by then??

Answer 1

heey!!! I think end of world by war will come first. This is my opinion. Humans tend to have their own unique personality. Thus, everyone is different from each other creating arguements, hatred, etc. Then, moody people who get crazy and angry fast, they will start to hate other people. And that doesn't take long. It may happen just in at most 2-3 weeks. People want to be envied, powerful, have pride, and all those deadly sins! We can't stop them. They contradict themselves. People change over time. They will either grow evil or become peaceful or stay the same. They want to live their life the way it is - who doesn't? Violence on TV by those superheroes, whatsoever actually influence people to become murderers and those violent people. They think it's all cool. Dictators - ALWAYS starting problems for us. Remember, this is my opinion. With all this hatred, violence, and all this commotion, the last solution or effect is war. War means to kill, to hate, to die. It doesn't take long to act any of those ways. People actually spend TIME on this. And, yes, the wars are caused by humans. Global warming will take a long time for mass extinction for humans. We can stop it. We can. humans have the brain. We fight for our own lives. Oh yes, we do - well, some of us. GLobal warming depends on the weather, pollution, etc. After the nuclear war, pollution is to be sent up to global warming. And then, bye. We live no more. we don't deserve it anymore.

As a conclusion, I think end of world by war comes first. Rememeber, everyone has their own opinions. You may think differently. But, this is just my opinion. I hope this helps!!! cuz i spent a long time thinking through this!!! ♥

good luck!!♥

Answer 2

TAKE YOUR PICK the mayas say 2012
the war may be sooner

id say the atom bombs is right now the biggest danger
here is my collection of ends of the humanity

dont worry the planet will survive ,but it is unlikely that we will
many predictions are for the years between 2012 and 2020
Nostradamus,the mayas ,Egyptions Jesus ,and Terrance Mckennas time wave who put the magnetic output of the world into a computor projection that stopped at zero in 2012,this stops the globe and it starts turning into
the other direction ,the resulting change of currents will turn the planet into a giant washing machine cleaning the surface

then there are the meteor ,the gulf of Mexico is the result of one that would have made life exstinct for a while ,this would result in an other ice age if the globe is covered in dust

then there are natural disasters
Volcanos are coming to life everywhere
the weather has giant storms like hurricanes ,tornados ,tidal waves ,earth quackes

a shift of the earth crust ,like a changing of the poles
under Anrarctica were found fosilized tropical plants indication the pole must have been in a different place then (the mainland atlantis is thought to be under it )

Now we got Global warming to contend with (see my answer on global warming)

and the biggest threat to any species of exstinction is ,when there are too little ,and when there are too many ,so overpopulation is also a threat

and the USA appears to be gunning for a global nuclear conflict .it is most likely that this will get us first looking at present politics

the planet will probably survive unless humanities bombs result it to be knocked out of its orbit

so many ends to choose from
if it wasnt so serious it would be rediculous

meanwhile enjoy life .and make the most of it at least we are all in the same boat

Answer 3

A nuclear war is more likely. Global warming will not destroy the earth because regions that are now too cold will become habitable. Even Al Gore doesn't claim that global warming will mean the end of the world. At worst it will cause populations to move from areas that are too warm to areas that are now too cold.

Answer 4

i think a pollution/global warming will happen first. the world is changing pretty fast with global warming, and i reckon a nuclear war will happen very very far away.

don't worry. scientists are trying to figure out ways to stop global warming and countries are trying hard to have no nuclear bombs or wars happening.[=

Answer 5

all of the above or none
Dear Al Gore:

Putting the technology together to start cleaning up and reintroducing new ozone to the atmosphere is possible. The cost and size of this project means taking a long term commitment. I am proposing the biggest cleanup in history. Al, I do not see any proposal that is realistic or proven at any cost, not even Washington can solve this problem. But if every person on earth does his or her share, we may be ok. Never-the-less, I see governments acting like a deer in a car’s headlights and people doing the same thing. The inevitable is almost upon us. Cleanup and change is the only option.
The first cleanup machine starts with a ten billion dollars investment. Ten year later with twenty-five machines operating, these machines will produce enough ozone to replace both holes at the poles. But more importantly, these machines will remove chemicals that deplete the ozone. Beyond making ozone, decreasing the poisons that deplete ozone, these machines reduce the major greenhouse gases and unbelievably we can have all this for fewer than one hundred billion dollars.
Beyond cleaning up our atmospheric mess as I am suggesting, we humans must do a better job reducing or cleaning up carbon monoxide, collecting and storing methane and ethane for fuel, burning less of everything, cleaning up our forests and using more solar insolation. Solar steam electric generators are the type of systems we need and are 90 percent efficient and near 100 percent if heat recovery is used. I believe nearly 30,000 MW are needed in the USA and Mexico over the next 30 years. This opens the door to new electric cars, new construction vital to our way of life, new bullet trains, and these industries produce new high paying jobs. From small scale solar generators on malls, to 2000 acre collector sights, these systems are viable and ready for production. The Federal Government must give up some land, money and have less regulation to help save the planet from disaster.
Al, spreading the message that we can help ourselves is a key to the development of these businesses. Washington can help: the businesses need grants, patents, land and regulations. Congress must create a pollution surcharge. From gas, coal, diesel, wood to cooling towers, from cattle, other ranches to cigarettes, from agriculture burning to airplane passengers, this surcharge can fund parts of these projects and many stationary pollution control devices in general.
Your personal support is very important to getting the atmosphere cleanup started and developing sights for solar generators.

Sincerely,

Answer 6

If I may use the Bible as the reference of my assurance, I will say that the end of the world will not come about, but Life will be as God intended for humankind. The planet earth was meant forever to exist for humankind. War and earth's ravaging will be curtailed. Nuclear war will start the beginning of the end of our civilization as we know it.

Answer 7

it extremely is not an the two-or question. think of what is going to take place whilst the sea point rises and important international ports are submerged. think of what is going to take place whilst the worlds organic supplies are scarce. i think whilst "push involves shove" those countries with the protection stress ought to will locate it "needed" to take the supplies they choose. First from the weaker countries, then one yet another. international warming might spark WWIII.

Answer 8

We're not sure! BUUUUT - when it does happen, hopefully the newschannel will have all the details. WORLD ENDED AT 10, NEWS AT 11, NOW BACK TO OUR REGULAR PROGRAMMING!

Answer 9

Which way will we kill ourselves first? The way things are going right now, it looks like war.

Answer 10

neither. July 7th, 2007. lol