Do you think the Gospel of Peter should have been included in the New Testament?
2007-03-15 13:38:23 · 5 answers · asked by Hmmm... 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Absolutely not because the early church knew that it was not written by Peter!
2007-03-15 13:41:13 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, It was anti-Semitic for starters, and since Jesus was a Jew, that cannot be right.
Also, the text found dates to the second century, which leaves Peter out as the author
2007-03-15 13:44:01 · answer #2 · answered by SpiritRoaming 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it's clear that it had gnostic influence... the cross the Jesus was crucified on could move and talk.......
2007-03-15 13:42:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, every book of the Bible that needs to be in it is in it.
2007-03-15 13:42:49 · answer #4 · answered by rockinweazel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is not for you to decide.
2007-03-15 13:50:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋