Whats the evidence FOR creationism?

Question

I know its easy for people who know little about biology to come up so called "holes" in the theory of evolution.
Can you please tell me what scientific evidence SUPPORTS creationism?
And if you do, can you tell me how was the "creator" created?
Then ask yourself if your answer is really plausible.

Grace B: Its fitting that you have to resort to circular logic to make your point. A small child could see through it.
P.S: There has never been a peer reviewed scientific paper published that supports the idea of creationism.

vikkip: I assume thats a joke answer

Answer 1

You like to repeat over and over the assertion that there are no peer reviewed creationist papers.

Marcus Ross' recent peer-reviewed Ph.D. in paleontology demonstrating he could accept Old Earth Darwinism as a working but falsifiable hypothesis is a data point that disproves your assertion.

I respectfully suggest you start here:
http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design-peer-reviewed-faq.htm

Then check out some others:
http://conference.nwcreation.net/

http://www.creationism.org/topbar/linksUS_L2Z.htm

http://www.gcc.edu/Conference_examines_evolution,_intelligent_design.php

http://www.darwinvsdesign.com/

I think you also need to bone up on the philosophical arguments around the notion of God before making loosely structured assertions:

Omnipotence:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/omnipotence/

Omnipresence:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/omnipresence/

The Problem of Evil:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/

Epistemology of Religion:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-epistemology/

Pascal’s Wager:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/

Ontology:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ontology/

Answer 2

That which begins to exist must have a cause and the universe began to exist. The creator is the eternal uncaused first cause, this is plausible because an infinite regression is not reasonable nor does the evidence support it.

Skeff, the proof you ask for is empirical and that requires inductive reasoning a form which is a formal fallacy my reasoning is deductive, the only reliable form. I could go into the ontological, telelogical and all the in's and out's of cosmological arguments but as long as your reasoning inductive I will make no sense what so ever.

Answer 3

There is a LOT of scientific evidence the SUPPORTS creationism.

If someone or somethng created the "Creator" then the "Creator" would not be the ultimate "Creator" but the "Creator" of Him would be the ultimate "Creator".

You should be asking this question at Answers In Genesis or Creation Research.

Answer 4

This is an easy question. The answer of course is Chuck Norris.

Answer 5

When we die, our bodies don't become monkees. They turn back into dust! Our creator wasn't created, He always was. And my answer is more plausible than a monkee falling out of a tree, standing up and shaving.

Answer 6

Besides holy books... none


* hey hand, if everything that exists has a creator, that would mean god has one too...

Answer 7

Hand - interesting philosophical assertion, but not proof.

That's double talk and presumptive drivel.

Answer 8

None.

next question.

Answer 9

Because everything must have a cause......... oh damnit, god is uncaused. err have a nice day.

Answer 10

Faith simply faith