By George H Smith, what did you think? Did you learn anything? Or did it just support what you already thought?
2007-03-15 07:47:16 · 6 answers · asked by Real Friend 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Did you read:
Case for a Creator
Case for faith
Case for Christ or any by Lee Strobel?
2007-03-15 09:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by Chris 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million) Civil marriage is a kind of incorporation. Its universal purpose is to administration possession of resources and prevent monetary chaos. The promoting of a nurturing surroundings for little ones is a secondary earnings, yet procreation hasn't ever been a reported purpose. the author makes an inaccurate assumption. 2) the author tries to prop up #a million with yet another philosophical argument. the actuality is, married couples have outnumbered unmarried adults for a lot of yankee historic previous, and married human beings needed the tax earnings. The social metrics are replacing and the tax spoil may replace too. 3) the author now characterizes his #a million as an unfunded mandate. both that's needed adequate to implement, or that's not major. He then dismisses each of the heterosexual exceptions as unenforceable or uncommon. This in undemanding words erodes his argument that #a million is major to the state. considering that gays are a minority, gay marriage may also be rather uncommon. And gay human beings are more beneficial useful able to grant a nurturing surroundings for little ones at the same time as they're legally recognized as a dedicated couple. The divorce price between heterosexual couples is over 50% so marriage is not any assure of stability for little ones. very last of all, the author asserts that sexual love endangers marriage and leades to chaos. go searching! that's how issues artwork NOW! allowing one discriminated team a similar rights as others received't make any distinction. Your author is clearly a Christian who thinks that by ability of no longer declaring God, he can make a logical argument out of his biases.
2016-12-02 01:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is also "God: The Failed Hypothesis," and the Dawkins classic "The God Delusion."
2007-03-15 07:53:55 · answer #3 · answered by Kharm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No
But my CASE against SCIENCE is the A Bomb and Pluto getting demoted.
Gee, I guess EVERYONE, sooner or later, gets thrown out of Eden!
2007-03-15 07:56:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have it, but have not finished reading it. I'm an atheist, so I suspect I'll find it agreeable.
2007-03-15 07:52:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no bye now god bless you
2007-03-15 07:58:58 · answer #6 · answered by *emokisses<3* 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋