2007-03-15 05:30:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Community Service
i was living in a big city for 35 years. now i have come to a small township to live. compared to the city life this is heaven. life is relaxing, fresh,& the nature is just bountiful & beautiful. ofcourse u must have something to do . i am teaching in a small school .being with innocent kids really refreshes u. to earn your livelihood u may have to be in the city. but for a calm &happy life it is always rural.
2007-03-15 05:36:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Live in a rural place and work in an urban environment.
2007-03-19 00:45:58 · answer #2 · answered by anne j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rural is the better place to live. Urban is the suitable place to spend the life under stress.
2007-03-15 13:39:50 · answer #3 · answered by selva r 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rural is better than urban because it's calm and quiet. ;)
2007-03-19 09:09:39 · answer #4 · answered by Suki 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends if you like breathing fresh air. If you do, then rural is the better place to live and breathe.
2007-03-15 12:34:00 · answer #5 · answered by chesscoach 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are pros and cons for both rural and urban. It does not matter where you stay, what matters is how you stay.
2007-03-15 13:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by vina 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
***Rural***-For Mental Satisfaction.
***Urban***-For Physical Satisfaction.
I personally think former better than latter.
2007-03-16 01:53:10 · answer #7 · answered by @Hepzi@ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rural by far, it allows you to be more objective towards city dwellers.
2007-03-15 12:35:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you wish to live king size be urbanised in a rural village internetted.
2007-03-15 13:26:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
rural - less pollution.
2007-03-15 13:53:04 · answer #10 · answered by Expression 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋