2007-03-15 04:54:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually, I just did a quick online topigal guide search on "Eagle" in the Bible, and I found all of this:
Ex. 19: 4 I bare you on eagles wings.
Deut. 28: 49 Lord shall bring a nation against thee . . . swift as the eagle flieth.
Deut. 32: 11 as an eagle stirreth up her nest.
2 Sam. 1: 23 Saul and Jonathan . . . were swifter than eagles.
Ps. 103: 5 thy youth is renewed like the eagles’s.
Isa. 40: 31 they shall mount up with wings as eagles.
Jer. 48: 40 he shall fly as an eagle.
Ezek. 17: 3 great eagle with great wings . . . came unto Lebanon.
Hosea 8: 1 He shall come as an eagle.
Matt. 24: 28 (Luke 17: 37; JS-M 1: 27) there will the eagles be gathered.
Rev. 4: 7 fourth beast was like a flying eagle.
2007-03-15 04:59:15 · answer #1 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it's the king of birds really. It would be much worse if the men who ran this country thought the turkey was a better choice. I think Benjerman Franklen looks like a turkey and thats why he wanted it to be the national bird.
2007-03-15 05:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by missgigglebunny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh my goodness...don't be rediculous. Should we pick another animal as the king of the jungle b/c the lion is mentioned in the bible? Should we hate children b/c they are mentioned alot in the bible? Should we get rid of all the rivers b/c they are mentioned in the bible? I can go on and on and on
2007-03-15 04:58:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that would be out of the question. Water, trees, women, & children are in the bible to...that doesn't mean The Department of Children & Families or the Wildlife Reserve shouldn't symbolize them.
2007-03-15 05:01:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because there are many kinds of Eagles. The Bald Eagle is only one kind.
2007-03-15 05:05:38 · answer #5 · answered by Maverick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey - if ol' Ben Franklin had HIS way - the national bird would have been the wild turkey!
How appropriate!
2007-03-15 04:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
And abolish life, since it is also mentioned.
2007-03-15 04:58:18 · answer #7 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are u serious?
2007-03-15 05:00:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
?????
NO!
2007-03-15 04:58:11 · answer #9 · answered by kissmymiddlefinger 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋