Yes...."Gitmo" is the term used for the base.
Guantánamo Bay Naval Base at the southeastern end of Cuba (19°54′N 75°9′W) has been used by the United States Navy for more than a century, and is the oldest overseas U.S. Navy Base. The United States controls the land on both sides of the southern part of Guantánamo Bay (Bahía de Guantánamo in Spanish) under a lease set up in the wake of the 1898 Spanish-American War. This facility is the only United States military installation on Communist territory. The current Cuban government rejects the Cuban-American Treaty on the grounds that it violates article 52 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and therefore considers the U.S. presence in Guantánamo to be an illegal occupation of the area. Article 52, however, declares a treaty void only if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of international law.[1]
Since 2001, the naval base has contained a military prison, the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp, for persons alleged to be militant combatants captured in Afghanistan and later in Iraq. Prior to 11 July 2006, the U.S. maintained that these detainees are not protected under the Geneva Convention.
Best wishes!
2007-03-15 04:51:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by KC V ™ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Guantanamo Is Not a Prison
Guantanamo is not a prison. According to the military handlers Guantanamo is officially a "detention facility." Although the two most recently built complexes, Camps Five and Six, were actually modeled on maximum and medium security prisons in Indiana and Michigan respectively, and although the use of feeding tubes and the handling of prisoners now take into account the guidelines of the American Corrections Association (and increasingly those of the Bureau of Prisons as well), it is not acceptable to use the word "prison" for Gitmo.
2007-03-15 04:58:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
those "criminal courts" lack many of the straightforward rights guarantees that exist in the U.S. structure, besides as in maximum different countries' constitutions. and they run the very real chance of being no longer some other thing beneficial than politically-inspired kanagaroo courts. US service workers should be exempted from them, because of overwhelmingly tremendous presence human beings service workers in distinct elements of the international -- oftentimes doing the dirty artwork that many different ocuntries do not want to do. If the U. S. replaced into held sure to those ridiculous "criminal courts," then the U. S. may do not have any decision yet to withdraw its troops from maximum of its bases global. And the countries in question may then ought to address -- and fund -- their personal protection and protection. Which a lot of them are both unable or unwilling to do. .
2016-12-02 01:19:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Originally a naval base and coaling station and according to the lease can only be used for those purposes. The prison there violates the lease and the US is like a bad tenant that refuses to leave.
http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps17563/www.nsgtmo.navy.mil/hischp3.htm
2007-03-15 04:56:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes its the same. GITMO is a base that we lease from Cuba. This lease agreement was made at the end of the Spanish American War and it takes both Cuba and the US to agree to dissolve much to Castro's dismay.
2007-03-15 04:52:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Gitmo is the same as Guantanamo.
2007-03-15 05:08:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by haylsin 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes
2007-03-15 05:59:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by EB 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If USA has had this since after the civil war, why can a Nerd like Obama lose it?
2015-02-02 09:03:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gwin 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's slang used by the Marines!
2007-03-15 04:50:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
One and the same.
2007-03-15 05:56:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋