I read an answer on here and someone said he is, I was just wondering if that was true or not. I haven't heard anything indicating he will be leaving his post.
2007-03-14 19:11:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yeah, I didn't think that sounded correct.
2007-03-14 19:52:34 · update #1
I haven't anything to that effect either.
2007-03-15 00:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Whatever happened to freedom of speech? They asked him his opinion, he gave it. The military owns your butt when you sign on the dotted line, what you do at home and off duty is your business, on duty, they tell you when where and how you eat, sleep and crap, that includes no sex. They have RULES, it's part of military discipline. No one is forced to serve, it's a privilege, not a right.
2007-03-15 02:17:29 · answer #2 · answered by theshadowknows 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Generals are protected by the First Amendment as much as anyone else.
2007-03-15 02:41:21 · answer #3 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nope.
GEN Pace is doing a great job.
2007-03-15 02:17:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No. Even the Chairman is allowed to have personal opinions.
2007-03-15 02:15:59 · answer #5 · answered by Fearless Leader 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Didn't hear anything about him leaving his post so I would assume a no.
2007-03-15 02:21:53 · answer #6 · answered by Memnoch 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Shouldn't be he allowed to have free speech.
2007-03-15 12:31:12 · answer #7 · answered by Knowledge 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Pace won't be fired until his gay lover comes forward with an interview.
2007-03-15 02:45:40 · answer #8 · answered by kappalokka 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋