I was told Highlife is the cheaper of the two by someone but I can't verify that. What is the difference in taste, etc?
2007-03-14 14:14:19 · 8 answers · asked by diggity801 1 in Food & Drink ➔ Beer, Wine & Spirits
Miller Lite was originaly the the Light version of High Life (the "champagne of beers" LOL)
With the introduction, years ago, of Genuine Draft the High Life was relegated to a bargain beer.
Miller Lite really hit it's stride with celebrity sports spokespersons and ads. Then in the low carb craze it got even more popular with its 3.2 grams of carb.
Taste? Well the slogan has it half right: "tastes great....less filling."
2007-03-14 14:21:43 · answer #1 · answered by Brooke B B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miller Lite High Life
2016-11-12 03:09:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Between the two? High Life. Hands down. High Life is not a light beer, That's why they have High Life Lite. Miller is better than anything Anheuser-Busch has ever made, but none of it comes close to Killian's Red
2016-03-18 04:52:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miller lite is a pilsner, High Life Light is a lager.
2015-02-07 05:29:16 · answer #4 · answered by JAY 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
high life is cheaper and has a weaker, more watery taste than lite
2007-03-14 14:20:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marketing is the only difference.
2007-03-14 15:30:30 · answer #6 · answered by dogglebe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who cares miller sux drink bud
2007-03-14 14:23:06 · answer #7 · answered by carrieffms 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
one has more water and the other .......well has water too.....get away from domestics,once you try imports or even good micro brews.........then your beer tastes buds will awaken
2007-03-14 15:50:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋