do you accept that the resistance , in case of defending its intenational borders IS TERRORIST?

Question

A lot young people left their families . and saccrified by heir souls to fire the enemy from their land & medias describe them as terrorist
note : i know a lot of them they have a high ranks of huminity , and feeling , but they thing that the issue more important

Answer 1

What?

This question seems to make no sense.

I think i'm starting to get it. Well people dying for their god and killing others in more of desperate guerrilla warfare if anything

Answer 2

I totally agree I don't believe defending ones country or its boundaries to be that of terrorism. But remember where the media is getting their info from rather one sided don't you think. It would be just like any other country that was occupied for longer than is just I would do pretty much the same thing am I a terrorist? An illegal combantant? I don't think so I would just be fighting for what is right. Sooner or later those resistors are going to win and good for them, they don't need to be occupied any longer.

Answer 3

You are right in a way but they are wrong in a more important way. It is one thing to use improvised weapons and bombs to attack the armies of those in power be they an occupying force or a repressive regime. It is another thing to use improvised weapons and bombs to attack civilians.

There is a difference between blowing up an armored car and blowing up a market. Unfortunately, neither side seems to recognize this and the innocents suffer. I will point out that the same can be said for those who attack civilians with tank shells and rockets while wearing uniforms. They are as much terrorists as those who strap on a bomb vest.

Peace out.

Answer 4

What makes a terrorist is the potential, no longer the reason. in case you aim civilians, then you certainly're a terrorist. in case you utilize procedures designed, to no longer win battles agains infantrymen, yet to terrorise populations, that makes you a terrorist. this is why I additionally evaluate Bush a terrorist -- focused on civilians, employing torture, "ask your self and awe" have been between his acts of terrorism.

Answer 5

I think martyrdoms where others are killed and the bomber dies are "suicide + multiple murder" operations. God does not like murder, and must punish, if the person is not forgiven. Sadly they have thrown away any slim chance of eternal salvation they might have had. Even if they killed every 'infidel' it wouldn't be worth it for them.
"What does it benefit if a person gains the whole world, but loses his soul".

Answer 6

Whatever they think the problem is/was - there must be a better solution than leaving their families to fend for themselves and sacrificing their souls - don't you think?

If this was such a good thing - why aren't the mullahs doing it?

Answer 7

Even if you/they were right...
Would you/they want to be right or would you/they want to be happy? What you have said shows what propaganda can often do. Ignorance is bliss. Stupidity is deadly.

What are they sacrificing? And where/what are you describing? A certain country/time/place would be helpful.

Answer 8

Why do they have to kill people?
Can't they work together to rebuild their country?
There's been enough destruction, what wil they gain by it?
The biggest casualties are not Coalition forces but ordinary Iraqi civilians.

Answer 9

Unfortunately when ever your on the losing or weaker side you are going to be painted as the villain, it is as perennial as grass.

Answer 10

This is our country so whatever it takes ,,,,