He didn't. We turned him over to the Iraqi government to do that. The only part we ever played was to provide Saddam security to ensure that he had his day in court.
2007-03-14 06:23:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Kings did kill kings in Midievel times. Usually these were lesser kings in the way of conquest of the more powerful kings.
Bush didn't kill Saddam. People at that level hire assassins to do the dirty work for them. Besides it was Iraqis that actually killed Saddam. He wasn't popular over there.
American weapons killed his two brats but Iraqi rope killed Saddam. He was ordered by an Iraqi judge in an Iraqi court to be hanged by Iraqis for crimes against Iraqis.
So, while Bush wanted to see Saddam dead he did not kill Saddam.
2007-03-14 06:26:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
While Americans captured him, they didn't kill him. And it sure wasn't Bush. They American Government turned Saddam over to the Iraqis and their government. There was a trial and he was found guilty for the horrible things that he did. That's why he was killed!
2007-03-14 07:31:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by layc_510 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gee whiz - get the facts straight. He was turned over to the Iraqi's and put on trial, found guilty, executed.
Also - Bush is not a King, neither was Saddam.
2007-03-14 06:27:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by mei-lin 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I take it you don't have time to watch TV news, read papers or news magazines. If you did, you'd know that Bush KILLED NO ONE! GOOD GRIEF..what do they teach you kids in school?
"SO CALLED CRIMES" by Saddam? Thousands upon thousands of his own countrymen MURDERED under Saddam's orders(including his family members) are SO CALLED CRIMES?
What are you, a SADDAM FAN? Saddam your hero? You wanna be SADDAM when you grow up?
2007-03-14 15:37:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
staring at various the previous solutions jogs my memory that people who shout loudest have the least to assert and the main to cover. The Iraqis that Saddam killed have been usually killed with the conivance and appoval of england and us of a of america, no longer that Britain has had an self sufficient voice for years, and we killed many with the sanctions we imposed on Iraq, which the politicians knew and particular was hoping could be the case, so as that they might portray what have been their murderous tyrant as now an self sufficient murderous tyrant. attempt looking in the back of the headlines, a number of you.
2016-10-18 09:09:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush killed Saddam? Really? I didn't know that. This whole time I thought the Iraqi court sentenced him to death for crimes against humanity. Where the hell have I been?
2007-03-14 06:23:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Obviously, you've been drinking or smoking something today. Bush didn't kill Saddam, Saddam's own people killed him. There wasn't even an American present when he fell and broke his neck.
2007-03-14 07:56:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
First, your knowledge of history is lacking - throughout history, kings have called for the head of other 'kings'.
The Iraqi government executed Saddam. What's so hard to understand about that?
Poison gas on Kurds, warehouses full of bodies, how many reasons do you need for capital punishment!
2007-03-14 06:27:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by jack w 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bush did not kill Saddam.
He killed hundreds in Texas and well over 3000 Americans in Iraq and possibly hundreds of thousands Iraqis, but he didn't kill Saddam.
2007-03-14 06:29:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Meg W 5
·
0⤊
1⤋