Nope. And I remember when I got my first Thesaurus too. It can make BS sound really good, can't it?
2007-03-14 06:23:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hi, this is Chad at the Crisis Center. We appreciate your call. We here at the center try not to fathom the unfathomable and believe those that try to do so are in danger of becomming the proverbial void. We urge caution. Thanks for calling and have a nice day.
2007-03-14 13:23:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
~~~~,,,,,, Nice try,,, but your question is a Contradiction in Terms as your hypothetical states that the Object is already "incomprehensible" and "unfathomable" ,,,, like Taoists, or anybody else, attempting to describe The Tao....
2007-03-14 14:28:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sensei TeAloha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suppose, but people (regardless of their religion) never really sit well with paradoxes. Most religious debates come down to "Who can find the paradox on the other team first?"
2007-03-14 13:22:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There might be intuitive appeal, but the argument would not be terribly strong.
2007-03-14 13:19:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if you can posit the provision of possible, unpaired, unpondered positions.
2007-03-14 13:26:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by JAT 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yea for Jesus is Lord of Lord and King of Kings. Jesus is alive!!!
2007-03-14 13:22:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tribble Macher 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2007-03-14 13:22:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by real illuminati(Matt) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
um...sure again.
2007-03-14 13:20:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Spud55 5
·
1⤊
0⤋