According to www.aish.com, "In many respects, the Oral Torah is more important than the Written Torah. ... We thus speak of two Torahs. There is the Written Torah (Torah SheBiKetav) and the Oral Torah (Torah SheB'Al Peh). Both are alluded to in God's statement to Moses, "Come up to Me to the mountain, and I will give you... the Torah and the commandments" (Exodus 24:12). ...The Written Torah cannot be understood without the oral tradition. Hence, if anything, the Oral Torah is the more important of the two." Aish.com then gives several convincing examples of occasions where God may have authorized oral tradition to supplement His Law: Deut. 12:21, Jer. 17:22 & Ecc. 12:12.
Yet, there is no evidence given to support God authorized the Jews to establish oral tradition interpreting what is (or is not) Messianic prophecy. So my question is, what authority gives preeminence to oral tradition over the Bible where Messianic prophecy is concerned?
2007-03-14
02:20:51
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Suzanne: YPA
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Gratvol: "getting"? LOL, I've been there for years! All I'm interested in is asking the deep questions. You've been asking them of us, so I guess it's my turn. Please humor me, ok?
2007-03-15
01:45:35 ·
update #1