2007-03-14 00:57:48 · 9 answers · asked by renganathan g 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Lord Ram was a "Maryada Purshouttam".He has a great strategy to combine forces of backward classes against Ravan ,a brahmin.
Ram united all lower tribes with helping them .
Bali was too power full,Once he defeated ravan also.
That man having a power to catch all energy of enemy.That's why Ram killed him from behind a tree.
Every thing is fair in love and war.
2007-03-17 08:01:45 · answer #1 · answered by Girish Sharma,yahoo superstar 6 · 23⤊ 0⤋
Just think the other way, 1.Ram didn't kill Bali 2.Bali easily killed Sugreev (he was more powerful) 3.Bali don't help Rama coz he was on his brother's side. 4. There is no other king to help Rama as everyone else fears Ravana. 5. Ravana continues becoming more & more powerful ( & greedy too )and it takes some time to conquer him. you see, in Ramayana, Rama was portrayed as a normal human being ( & not as a god) Killing Bali was a strategy to get the support from Sugreev later on. Otherwise it would have been very difficult for Rama to kill him It also shows that Rama sacrifices all of his good image just to save the humanity from the evil acts of Ravana. P.S. - Even if Bali didn't have enough points to prove his argument, it was totally wrong to kill someone powerful than you by betraying him
2016-03-28 22:44:23 · answer #2 · answered by Scharri 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To grab one anothers wife is a sin that stoops below any standard of dharma. Bali not only expelled his own brother Sugreeva from the kingdom which no king should do, but compelled Sugreeva's wife to live with him on the worst side of it.
When it was known that Bali was endowed with a devine blessing that he will absorb the entire energy of anyone who stood against him to fight, Sri Rama in the best of his wisdom decided to kill the culprit to protect his blemish-less bhaktha and to yield him solace., by following a strategy of warfare though seemingly it may appear to be a slip from the Lords Natural standards.
But this again is an evidence to show that the Lord Almighty as SRI Rama, will not spare any means if it is to protect the one who had faith on Him.
2007-03-14 01:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by marsh man 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My dear brother,
Vali is a offender. He took his brothers wife. Vali also had a power "Whoever fights in front of him will loose their 50% of their strength" So even Rama can't kill him directly. Sugreeva came with a petition to Rama. Now Rama has to punish Vali. While punishing an offender you can't show Mercy. So also the offender can't claim how he has to be punished. Rama has no other go than killing him indirectly.
2007-03-14 01:38:04 · answer #4 · answered by RANJANI 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
By reading the original Valmiki Ramayana, one can understand the truth as it is.
There are many misinterpretations which mislead one misguide one on the wrong path.
Things, if taken out of context and applied give a complete wrong idea. Things should be taken within context.
2007-03-15 01:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Gaura 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No justification in a civilised society, who condemn killing, that too indirectly. One can be sentenced to death and executed directly, on proof of his offence through reliable and truthful witnesses, in an open court, directly in view of public.
2007-03-14 09:28:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a lesson. If a person is wrong and is powerful, you are allowed to cheat and win against him.
All the best...
:-)
2007-03-14 07:59:20 · answer #7 · answered by plato's ghost 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any one who believe in their riligioun will justify anything what their people have done. And if others even kill even a fly they will accuse them of being terrorists.
2007-03-14 01:01:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Greatest politician of his time.
2007-03-17 17:20:26 · answer #9 · answered by vishw_paramaatmaa_parivaar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋