how can one connect religion and science ?

Question

about what each teaches.

Answer 1

Science is the study of the existence we're in.

Religion is the study of what is beyond this existence and how it came to be.

The best analogy I've heard about this was Written by C.S. Lewis in Mere Christianity.

He compares it to finding yourself in a house, you have no knowledge of anything outside of the house. Simply by making observations about the house there is no way you can come to any conclusions about who the house was made, who made it and why.

True science is only observations about how this universe works. Religion involves something internal and unobservable.

Obiously Mr. Lewis explains this far better then I have.

Answer 2

I notice that most people, when referring to religion, mean the Judeo/Christian/Islamic religions coming out of the MiddleEast. There are many, many religions not from that area that do not view science and religion as being contrary to one another. I like the following quote by Alfred Einstein: "The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism."

Answer 3

Science is merely the study of the physical world. You can look at things and through the scientific method you can explain why they happen, what influences them, and when they will happen.

I have no problem seeing evolutionary theory as an explanation of how God created the world. So many that combines the two: religion and science.

But science will NEVER disprove any religious belief. And religion will never disprove any scientific theory.

Answer 4

Well scientist spend all their time trying to figure out how things came in to existence without God, so they are actually absorbed in thoughts about God's creation all the time. Religionists already know how how things came into existence, so they can use their time wisely showing their appreciation for creation! Religion teaches appreciation for the Creator, and scientist teach disrespect and ingratitude for the life that God has given them.

Answer 5

you're no longer able to completly conect technology and faith. The earth and the Heavens etc replaced into needless to say no longer created in 7 days, and of corse there is such significant evidance that dinasaurs did exist, and jesus additionally exited. however the form you have further a million + a million think approximately 3. good judgment is incongruent. all of us recognize from technology and evidance that human beings have not been around for 60,000,000 years. in case you think of of this 60billion years because of the fact the 24 hrs of a clock then human beings have in basic terms existed for the previous few seconds. so the adam and eve tale of being created merely after the earth is misguided. that's real regardless of the indisputable fact that that we began to count extensive form the years atthe start of christianity that's after the death of jesus yet its no longer acurate. Jesus did no longer die precisely 2009 years in the past. the ingredient you would be able to desire to evaluate is that the Bible replaced into writen by way of human beings, who at that element didnt havethe point of knowladge and evidance that we've on the instant, so their interpirtations on how we got here approximately will of corse be massively distinctive to us. The bible is what human beings at that element theory occurred. you won't be able to take the bible to be actuality. Its an interpritation. Interpritations and comments are no longer actuality. on the different hand, technology has helped to tutor specific aspects of the bible, inclusive of Noahs Ark and the large Flood. there is information that there replaced right into a flood, no longer international, yet sufficiently vast to reason distruction, and in a acceptable area to be the comparable flood as interior the bible. have you ever puzzled why interior the previous testomony there is greater extreme memories, international floods, plagues, and then sinse no longer something as extreme has occurred? it rather is because of the fact our interpritations of what happens around us has replaced. do i make any experience in any respect? i wish i do.

Answer 6

The problem is falsifiability. Science speaks in terms of what can be disproven. "An imperceptible being did it" is the ultimate non-falsifiable statement. In a sense, you can define religion and science as what the other does not cover.

Answer 7

Check out 'Creator and the Cosmos' by Hugh Ross for how the latest in astrophysics lines up with Genesis one

Answer 8

Hmmmm...

Ok...I think I may have one...
The Bible states there was a flood.
Archeologists have found fossils of fish in the mountains.

Is that a connection?
It may not be but hey worth a shot right?

Answer 9

If one is smart, one doesn't try to connect the two, they weren't meant to.

Answer 10

You can't.
Science teaches fact.
Religion teaches mythology