Yes! I've often thought the same thing. What we are saying is to divide Christians into two clearly defined groups; those that take the bible literally and those that kind of reinterpret it to fit with what they've learned from science. The part of this that I always get stuck upon is the fact that Christians already are divided not just into two groups but thousands! So what difference would another division make? None at all.
2007-03-13 15:48:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Desiree J 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whatever you want. Would be interesting if there were really people who took the bible literally--especially considering the part where Jesus said the 2nd coming was going to be during the same generation the apostles were in at the time! So the 2nd coming already happened! WHat are these people all worked up about for, it is already over!@
2007-03-13 23:08:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could name a few alternatives!
But I would be inundated with violations!
But then again, what would one more "pretend faith" matter in a world full of "literal religions"?
2007-03-13 22:48:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by tattie_herbert 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fundamentalist means the same.
2007-03-13 22:45:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds good to me. Or just stick with "Fundies", same thing.
2007-03-13 22:47:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by tonks_op 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I always called them "Literalists". Or Biblical Literalists. Or "mom and dad!"
2007-03-13 22:46:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Laptop Jesus 2.0 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
"Biblist" sounds like a term for celebrity babies.
2007-03-13 22:46:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by ivorytowerboy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Haha..Fun....ny
2007-03-13 22:45:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Royal Racer Hell=Grave © 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um, sure. Whatever you want.
2007-03-13 22:45:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋