Sure go ahead, but stand by for heavy rolls to port and having YOUR hind parts kicked up around your shoulder blades, you ungrateful wretch!
And when HE gets through, I'll be standing in line to get a few kicks in, along with several thousand OTHER VETS. I'd add my REAL feelings about people like you, but you'd go run off to MOMMY YAHOO how insulting I was to you and I really don't feel like dealing with those yahoos. As if I really give a rat's patoot.
Ah what the hell; YOU'RE A WORTHLESS, UNGRATEFUL A.S.S. HOLE! SCREW YOU!
(USN, retired/in-country Viet Nam vet/proud patriot)
2007-03-14 16:27:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why would you blame (let alone slap) someone for having an opinion different than yours?
Also as a point, the war in Iraq is not illegal. Ignoring that it's not technically a war, the conflict and the deployment are legal and valid, because they are pursuant to a valid Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) voted on by Congress.
You may think that Congress should not have passed that law, and you wouldn't be alone. But the fact is, they did pass the AUMF, which makes the Iraq deployment legal.
2007-03-13 15:32:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
10⤊
1⤋
Go ahead, slap him silly, show him how much he has failed you and all your fellows and, of course those who got liquefied in the towers and everyone else who hopes the world understands that there is a way to relate to us and not a way to relate to us and of course in the end when all your rights and privileges and hopes and dreams for a future for your children and their children are no longer available and are at the mercy of strong powers who wish to have control and overcontrol of all reality and you and your minions haven't got the support of a strong popular backed military who will be totally wrong to do such a thing as fight so you can slap them in the face. Wake up...
2007-03-13 15:38:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by JORGE N 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
?? properly, I provide you this, you researched your question. So I definately know you for going during the complication. and that i checked for accuracy (on a number of it, no longer all) too. good job!! I certainly have a pair themes with this however. a million. you're evaluating apples and oranges. each conflict is diverse. Our WWII losses might have doubled if we did no longer drop the bombs. ought to we evaluate doing that now, as Nixon curiously did throughout Vietnam? 2. bear in concepts "venture carried out"? become that the top of the conflict? Technically, we are no longer in a conflict spectacular now. possibly using fact of this the dems are disillusioned. what's the venture in Iraq? First it become WMD's. Then whilst that became out to be a bald-confronted lie, we shifted to "isn't it extra useful now that Saddam isn't in potential?". After that, it become "we ought to offer stability till a central authority is shaped". All that has been completed. So, what's next? what's the venture? Oh, now we ought to attend till the Iraqi military is as much as job. BTW, bear in concepts how Rumsfield demanded that the Iraq military be disbanded? might it no longer have been extra useful to maintain them in provider? 3. have you ever asked the mamma and papa of #2,582 on your stat sheet approximately how they experience? you're lacking the whole element of the controversy via focusing on "deaths", and exhibiting us that it is not probably that undesirable. the element is, we are caught, only like Vietnam and Korea. whilst are the troops coming abode? We nonetheless shop 30,000 plus (i think of, be happy to spectacular me if i'm incorrect) in South Korea. yet our troops in Korea are not loss of life. Iraq troops are. And, the democrats ask, WHY? It has no longer something to do with loss of life expenses, yet why we are over there, what's the venture?
2016-11-25 01:46:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No military man should be punished for doing his job. We went into vietnam based on the assumption that communism was going to take over. Should we slap all the vets from that war? What about Korea? Just because the administation lied doesn't mean our men in uniform deserve any less respect.
2007-03-13 15:30:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mommy 3
·
10⤊
2⤋
The WMD angle was wrong. The fact remains that Saddam was in violation of 17 UN resolutions and had actively tried to assassinate a sitting US President (Bush senior) in Kuwait. That reason alone is grounds for war.
I encourage you to thump a military man the next time you see one. When you end up looking at the ceiling and wondering how you got there, remember that it was your idea.
2007-03-13 15:34:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
would you like my adress,I can hardly wait,I served 20 years in the army and twice I have been to Iraq,first in 1990-1991 then again in 2003-2006.I may not believe what bush has said but I support the troops.
2007-03-14 01:52:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
We are all entitled to our opinions, besides it is assault.
It is a camaraderie that YOU WILL NEVER understand.
IT IS THE SOLDIER, not the reporter,
Who has given us freedom of the press.
IT IS THE SOLDIER, not the poet,
Who has given us freedom of speech.
IT IS THE SOLDIER, not the campus organizer,
Who has given us freedom to demonstrate.
IT IS THE SOLDIER, not the lawyer,
Who has given us the right to a fair trial.
IT IS THE SOLDIER, who saluted the flag,
Who serves under the flag and
Whose coffin is draped by the flag
Who allows the protester to burn the flag.
Charles M. Province
2007-03-14 03:52:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Renee 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I wish you would notify me in advance. I would love to watch. Now if you were to slap some young recruit, he might be happy with only breaking a few of your bones. If you try that with a tired old VET, you will be lucky if your momma and daddy receive enough pieces to bury.
2007-03-13 16:10:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by John H 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Why should I "NOT" slap a coward Boy for supporting the enemies of America
2007-03-13 16:21:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by followme 2
·
3⤊
0⤋