1995-Mazda Millenia S(127,354 miles)- Featurs include, ,,fully loaded, all leather, heated seats, power sunroof, key less entry alarm, extremely clean, cassette and CD changer, power window, power doorlock, keyless entry, alarm, A/C, Heat,this vehicle is extra clean, ready to go, price includes 3 month/3000 mile warranty.
1999-Pontiac Grand Am SE(119,787 miles)- withVery clean car, keyless entry, alarm, cruise control, cd player, price includes 3month/300
Both are priced at 2,490.00
So tell me which one??
2007-03-13 15:05:53 · 10 answers · asked by tigger_gurl_06 2 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Buying & Selling
check kellyblue book, and try a car and driver consumer comparison
2007-03-13 15:10:38 · answer #1 · answered by davemart77 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Grand Am hands down not only is it newer, lower mileage but as far as only a Mazada to Pontiac comparision on the conventional engine styles the pontiac is more duarable...
Cheaper on part to fix as well... in 1995 when the luxury tax hit automobiles of $30,00 or more it had an unexpected and unpredicted effect on the price of import parts period even the cheap non $30,000 models..
foreign parts jumped in less than 2 weeks by 15-20% at the parts counter...
if the Mazada had had the rotary engine my advice would have been to take the Mazada the rotarys were good when they ran and were taken care of correctly...
Walt
2007-03-13 15:38:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ronk W 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All things being equal, most persons would probably advise you to choose the Mazda and, if all things were equal, I'd probably agree.
A big differential will be how these cars were driven and taken care of. If you have any way to determine if regular maintenance was done on either, that's going to be a big plus. Although the mileage difference is neglible, those extra years on the Mazda will be a big negative if routine oil changes were ignored.
2007-03-13 15:17:52 · answer #3 · answered by samfrio 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're somewhat richer than i'm. My first automobile grew to become right into a ninety 8' buick for 6000. besides, i think of you ought to pass with the Ford. real, the fors is around 5000 money extra reasonably-priced,and that i've got pushed a Toyota, its purely extra comfotable as quickly as you force it. regardless of the undeniable fact that, before paying for a automobile on purely those 2 factors (mileage and value), i might seem on the interior, and teh gasoline comsumption etc. as quickly as I first bought my automobile, my mom used to constantly tell me to choose for the single with teh decrease mileage on it, because of the fact they're "meant" to final longer. yet i propose, 82k isnt tht many miles besides. as I pronounced b4, the 5 thousand greenback is a brilliant ingredient. you are able to purchase a 2d automobile with that money (heavily). in case you sense that the Explorer drives properly and all that, i might propose you purchase the Ford. regardless of the undeniable fact that, from my own adventure, Toyotas are lots gentle, yet i think of the 5000 is purely too lots of a distinction to atone for that.
2016-10-18 08:00:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither one is great but the Mazda is much better quality.
2007-03-13 16:02:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say the Mazda because of the rumors spreading around that American cars are crap.
2007-03-13 16:42:40 · answer #6 · answered by whittingtontexas 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Here's a link on ebay Map-It where you can find them in your home town.
2007-03-14 03:34:59 · answer #7 · answered by mike m 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought you said Great cars??? Honda or Toyota, now those are Great cars!!
2007-03-13 15:26:01 · answer #8 · answered by Bensalem Strangler 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
go with the pontiac, it has less miles on it and less crap that will break.
2007-03-13 15:14:47 · answer #9 · answered by Jimmy C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great cars? You mean JUNK cars.
I say keep looking.....
2007-03-13 17:00:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋