Wow - that's a take I've heard before and it's disgusting.
Like I've said in other places - why don't we measure life by a heartbeat? If a fetus has a heart beat why are we killing it? Outside the womb that would be murder.
Trying to justify it in long reaching ways just makes it seem even more unjust. Saying that we are helping the unborn into heaven is, again, disgusting. We as a society have agreed that it is wrong to take a life - regardless of religious persusaion. We don't we stick by that - instead of making it about women's rights (which it is not)?
No, I'm not a Christian. In fact I didn't become completely pro-life until after I left Christianity. A couple of miscarriages can change your perspective on things.
2007-03-13 15:05:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by noncrazed 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a Christian I'd have to say yes they would go to Heaven. Now as a logic I'd have to question that. Yes, I have experience the power of Almighty God, but really think of this one to even bring your question out even more. If God rested on the 7 day then what now He is making new souls?
We really don't know for a certainity what happens when someone dies. WE hear a lot of stories. WE hear a lot of opinions, but truth be known we don't know the facts for sure of what happens when we die.
Is it a chance that I would want to take? Never. Not in a million years. After all, let me leave you with this question, if God rested on the 7th day and said it is finished, then that means He can't be in the making business anymore, therefore does that mean there are souls waiting to be born, or maybe just maybe reincarnation could be true?
2007-03-13 15:12:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Terri 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It also changes the moms chances from 50/50 on heaven to 100% to Hell, except if she's Catholic, who have the Sacrament of Reconciliation.
2007-03-13 15:12:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by freemanbac 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have heard some christians say the "age of accountability" is age 6, so any kid who dies prior to age 6 gets to go to heaven, just because they say so on the basis of their determination. I guess at age 6 or 7 is when they may say your 50/50 factor comes in, depending on the child's competence or how rebellious he or she is.
I love how presumptuous American evangelical Christians get.
2007-03-13 15:11:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps for the child that is true.
However, it really stamps the ticket to Hell for the person performing the abortion, doesn't it? They are certainly butchering an innocent, aren't they?
Who wants to face God with that kind of blood on their hands, anyway?
2007-03-13 15:09:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by MamaBear 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well perhaps. But then you suport the doctor and mom or couple doing this. And theres two or three in hell for one in heaven. I doubt any repentance could happen once your heart is so hardened that you would kill a person because they are "inconvenient for my schedule".
This constant mockery of G-d isn't going to get you far.
David
2007-03-13 15:04:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by David T 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well that may or may not be true, but what should be the main concern is what chances does it change for the person(s) causing the abortion.
2007-03-13 15:03:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Heaven's Messenger 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Isn't that like saying, if I take you out, there is a 100% chance that there will be 1 less stupid person on this earth?
I bet you're glad your mom didn't share the same opinion.
2007-03-13 15:04:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Okay, but thats a really old, and quite honestly silly argument in support of abortion.
2007-03-13 15:02:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by sweetie_baby 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
See it's not about the afterlife. It SHOULD be, but it isn't. Every time a fetus is aborted, that's one less person the church could conceivably corrupt into coughing up 10% of its earnings. Read between the lines!
2007-03-13 15:03:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gene Rocks! 5
·
3⤊
4⤋