Do you think it is strange that the majority of a certain religion depends on the area or country? Do you think that if you were born in china that you would still be a cristian -or a budhist? Would you roll with what your family believes? And also, what do you think about those who's beliefs break away from what is normal.
2007-03-13 10:57:00 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Just goes to show that there is no factual basis for religious belief.
2007-03-13 11:00:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
i might agree partly. i'm vulnerable to have confidence faith become presented via leaders of the previous as a manor of concepts administration. taking part in on human beings's fears is a factor of the inspiration of religion, yet we can not forget approximately greed as a element to boot. multiple the non secular teachings are exceedingly constructive however, yet in the top i think of religions do extra injury than good. that's an instantaneous thank you to discriminate others, and we've such a good number of alternative issues that are extra useful to discriminate against, alongside with stupidity.
2016-11-25 01:13:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is interesting.
True also.
I was born in the Northeast US.
Most are Catholic here.
So I was brought up Catholic.
Schools and all.
Then it happened, wowser.
All of a sudden I wasn't Catholic anymore. The rest of my family remained Catholic.
Most all of them.
Just a few became another denomination.
I however claim no denomination.
I am a Christian.
A truly amazing experience.
2007-03-13 11:07:12 · answer #3 · answered by chris p 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The majority of belief is born of the family of origin's belief. Those who break away are either damned, stupid, or disowned, or lucky.
2007-03-13 11:05:52 · answer #4 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋