English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sense the logic of my questions was lost on the last question im going to reword some questions and leave out the points cause people just couldnt comprehend it.

Question one? Does Evolution have an ending?
Question two? If life could be created in such a process can we create life in the future ever?
Question three? If we did indeed create life, would our creations percieve us as gods?
Question four? If evolution evolves forever on a world with different rules then why couldnt they have powers which are unnatural to us?
Question five? If there had to be special conditions for life to develope which may prevent life forms on other planets from evolving the same then how probably 1-100 percent 100 being greatest is it that that new life form had its enviroment evolve too in a likewise manner?
Question six? If the galaxy is only so old. And we are only so old. And evolution takes a long process. How reasonable is it to think that we sprung to life within that given time?

2007-03-13 10:45:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anthony Souls 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

Here we are.

2007-03-13 10:48:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Question one? Does Evolution have an ending?
-No

Question two? If life could be created in such a process can we create life in the future ever?
-Evolution is not about creation of life, but yes we will be able to

Question three? If we did indeed create life, would our creations percieve us as gods?
- Probably not

Question four? If evolution evolves forever on a world with different rules then why couldnt they have powers which are unnatural to us?
-- They could as long as they are governed by the laws of physics. Maybe ultraviolet vision?

Question five? If there had to be special conditions for life to develope which may prevent life forms on other planets from evolving the same then how probably 1-100 percent 100 being greatest is it that that new life form had its enviroment evolve too in a likewise manner?
- almost zero

Question six? If the galaxy is only so old. And we are only so old. And evolution takes a long process. How reasonable is it to think that we sprung to life within that given time?
- completely, since we apparently did.

2007-03-13 11:01:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

> Does Evolution have an ending?
Not really. It will end on earth after the sun changes its format about five billion years hence.

> can we create life in the future ever?
Why wait? We've created software-based life already.

> If we did indeed create life, would our creations percieve us as gods?
Nope.

> If evolution evolves forever on a world with different rules then why couldnt they have powers which are unnatural to us?
You canna change the laws of physics -- Scotty

> had its enviroment evolve too in a likewise manner
We have no way of knowing.

> How reasonable is it to think that we sprung to life within that given time?
I think, therefore I am. It happened. 100%.

2007-03-13 10:53:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

1. Everything ends eventually, in10^100 years time, even by the most conservative estimates there will either have been a big crunch or all available energy will have been used.

2. Almost certainly, we just need the technology, and are getting closer every day through research.

3. It depends how intelligent the life we created was. If they were intelligent enough to develope spirituality then I believe it would be our duty to enlighten them that we are not gods.

4. Life could be different, but all life must still obey the laws of physics.

5. I don't really understand, there ia 100% probabiility that any surviving life anywhere will either be adapted to its environment, or have adapted its environment (i.e. like humans on the moon) in order to ensure survival.

6. The galaxy is very, very, very old. Picture the age of the earth as a 24 hour clock, beginning at midnight. The first things which could be called life appeared at 4am, the differences between plants and animal cells didn't occur till 6pm. Multicellular life happened around 8pm. The dinosaurs came around 11:40pm. Homo Sapiens have been around since 11:59:58pm. The galaxy is around 3 times as old as the earth.

2007-03-13 10:55:39 · answer #4 · answered by Om 5 · 0 0

1. Obviously not. As long as reproduction is happening, evolution is happening. Every child of every animal is not exactly like their parents. So they are continuing to change genetically.
2. Are you talking about abiogenesis? They have formed simple life from nothing in laboratories. We have controlled populations of animals from human influence as well. there are several cases of this. Dogs would be a simple example.
3. Again, we can only "create" simple life. It wouldn't be possible to get complex (multi-celled organisms) life from nothing. Therefor we can't create complex life, only alter it. Again, like dogs.
4. The rules or laws of physics remain the same no matter what. There might be different environments, but the laws of science will remain the same.
5. The chances of life starting and evolving would probably be about 1 in 1 billion for any given time where it is possible. But the earth was around for about 10 billion years before life. So really it is inevitable that life would be on other planets. And it means it would be impossible for no life to exist.
6. As said before, it is almost inevitable that life would start here on earth.

2007-03-13 11:24:11 · answer #5 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 0

1) No. There is no reason for evolution to end, espcially on Earth which is contstantly undergoing geologic activity (and thus changing environments and allowing for adaption).

2) Possibly. We just need to figure out how it was done.

3) Who knows?

4) Sure they could. But you can't 'evolve' the power to violate the laws of physics.

5) Not quite sure what you mean. Planets adapt and evolve as well as animals.

6) We're talking about an Earth that is 4.5 billion years old. It can be hard to imagine how much time that is, and the first life probably appeared about 3 billion years ago. 3 billion years is an incrediably large amount of time, espcially considering that most animals reproduce on much smaller time scales than humans (within a year of birth, many animals are capable of reproduction, and we definitely started out as one of those).

2007-03-13 10:55:46 · answer #6 · answered by eri 7 · 0 0

Q1. I think its to do with evolving to ur enviroment so until that stops changing and ppl stop going new places it wont.
Q2. Most likely. dont we already, fidling with the genes of plants and such. or in the other way having children.
Q3.ahh that type of creation. ermm... I would percieve someone who made me as god even if they didnt make everything. just not the main one.
Q4.erm... well they could and b definition of evolving forever wld eventually.
Q5. hard to follow that question. 50-50 it either will or wont i guess.
Q6. i think its kinda proven we exist after the universe? is that wot u ment. post less questions at a time maybe. good Q's tho

2007-03-13 10:54:59 · answer #7 · answered by thenovel_writer 2 · 0 0

you have selectively quoted Darwin. the completed version is: To assume that the attention with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the concentration to distinctive distances, for admitting distinctive quantities of sunshine, and for the correction of around and chromatic aberration, would have been formed by employing organic decision, seems, I freely confess, absurd interior the utmost degree. yet reason tells me, that if distinctive gradations from a suited and complicated eye to one very imperfect and straightforward, each and each grade being smart to its possessor, could be shown to exist; if extra, the attention does variety ever so somewhat, and the adjustments be inherited, that's surely the case; and if any version or replace interior the organ be ever smart to an animal below changing circumstances of life, then the undertaking of believing that a suited and complicated eye ought to be formed by employing organic decision, inspite of the indisputable fact that insuperable by employing our mind's eye, can hardly be seen genuine. In different words, Darwin stated an eye fixed ought to evolve if it did so in small steps.

2016-09-30 21:17:48 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Sure. Yeah. Right.

BUT THEY STILL ARENT GODS. They are evolved life forms. The God is not an evolved life form - he is a fabrication of the human mind. Comprende?????

2007-03-13 10:51:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

You said hypothetical question 2, but I see 6 questions. Which is it?

2007-03-13 10:50:45 · answer #10 · answered by sngcanary 5 · 0 0

you need to watch a movie, it's called "what the bleep do we know" reality is realative, perception is everything.

2007-03-13 10:49:48 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers