Anyone can save themselves for marriage. It is up to the individual.
2007-03-13 09:33:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Personally, I believe abstinence is a personal choice. There's nothing wrong with it if it's what you truly believe and want for yourself. Of course the only people I've met who were against premarital sex were religious. But I imagine that anyone of any faith or non-faith could easily choose to remain abstinent until marriage. So sure - a person could be an atheist and choose to be against premarital sex. I don't see why not.
2007-03-13 09:33:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by swordarkeereon 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
All value systems, religious or lay, aim at helping us do the "right thing". In years past, girls who had sex before marriage were bound to get preg - cause birth control is a fairly recent invention - and that was and probably still is not as good a position to be in as to be married when you have kids. But now that birth control exists, it may be that those values are no longer as relevant.
However sex does lead to emotional consequences. So, I think the best advice would be don't have sex until YOU feel like having sex. when you feel love, and loved, and your closest friends and even parents endorse the person, and it's not "hidden" or "forbidden" but stands up in the light of day, then you are ready. It's up to you really - the earth won't spin any faster or slower if you have sex or don't. Try to be kind to yourself with it, is all.
2007-03-13 09:34:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by All hat 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is nothing wrong with that. There are atheists or agnostics that do not have sex before marriage just because of their own personal reasons. Some do not want the possiblity of pregnancy or want to deal with the emotional side of a sexual relationship. There is nothing wrong with choosing to do that. It isn't the norm and there are people that don't understand why another person would want to do that. But, if you want to do that, then you have that right. If someone doesn't respect your choice, they aren't worth your time. It may not be the norm, but there are others that do it.
2007-03-13 09:40:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by One Odd Duck 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is nothing wrong with waiting. People feel so pressured to have sex b/c that's what everyone else is doing or it's the cool thing to do. It's not all what it's cracked up to be anyways. Sure it feels good and creates precious children, but the feel good part lasts 10 seconds and then poof it's over!! Waiting until you're married makes it all the more special...trust me. I didn't wait and feel very robbed of sharing that special moment with my hubby.
STD's are very rampant these days and AIDS is just one of the many that you definently don't want to get. There are more benefits in saving yourself for marriage then having sex right now. Just find friends that support your beliefs and also make sure that any boyfriend of yours is cool with the "no sex policy" b/c most of them just want sex. Good luck to ya my friend.
2007-03-13 09:38:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Abby's momma 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Most likely so. But by the same token, all religious people aren't necessarily against premarital sex.
2007-03-13 09:33:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by kj 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
As long as you have morals, you can be against premarital sex.
It's like one of the smartest things someone can do, no matter what religion you profess to be or don't be!
2007-03-13 09:40:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥LadyC♥ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a Pagan, I think it says a lot when a person waits until they're married to have sex. There's nothing wrong with it at all.
2007-03-13 09:39:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joa5 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its your body, and you have the right to choose what happens with it............
Oh wait, Christians don't really believe that.
JK
Premarital Sex is a personal choice, some agree some don't. There are many cultures in the world that enjoy it, so judging whether it is right or wrong is also a personal choice.
2007-03-13 09:36:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
nicely its a own decision, yet i do imagine its exceedingly naive and stupid to attend until eventually when you marry someone, because in spite of the undeniable fact that many couples received't want to admit it, yet sex is a huge portion of a wedding ceremony, its oftentimes the reason of ending or saving a wedding ceremony, and in case you discover out when you marry someone that they are in a very diverse options set about sex, then your exceedingly screwed, and that i know you should chat about what you imagine you want in mattress earlier marriage yet sex is a few thing human beings are embarrassed about and could no longer allow you to know they're into chains and whips until eventually eventually they experience tender, and some human beings do not discover this stuff out until eventually they start up having sex so for all you know the guy you marry after many years ought to attempt with issues your no longer tender with and also you won't be able to have a sturdy chuffed marriage without sex, and in case your needs at the prompt are not being fulfilled by ability of him and in case your no longer up for enjoyable him in the way he likes (and also you shouldn't in any respect experience forced into doing some thing your no longer pleased with) it may end the marriage or you'll stay in an unhappy one. maximum if no longer anybody discover out what they prefer in mattress after having sex and in case you wait until eventually eventually after marriage to discover this out you may nicely be in for a wonder and not in any respect in the sturdy experience. do not get me incorrect I actually have in undemanding words had sex with one lady in my existence, my attractive spouse, yet we had to have sex earlier marriage because we had to earnings from the finished elements of a relationship earlier we entered into marriage.
2016-12-01 22:57:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by meran 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are talking about two completely different things. All being an atheist means is the person has no belief in god. It has nothing to do with other things they believe.
2007-03-13 09:40:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋