In the documentary the Book of Phillips was blacklisted by the emerging all male clergy cause it gave too much prominence to Mary Magdalene. It is clear that the Bible it's at best an "edited" word of God and some very real life people did play God in selecting the "legit" Books from the false and the criteria used in this selection is highly questionable. So you people wake up and smell the coffee, you are parrotting words of God that are just a bad taste Joke.
2007-03-13 08:13:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I agree...The crucifixion of Jesus was unknown among the early church as late as the end of the second century. This was close to 176 years after the church would like us to believe the brutal end of its God occurred. It must be immediately pointed out that the modern church admitted the records of Bishop Irenaues (d.202) created a serious problem. They said of him: “Although of crucial importance in the development of the church’s theology. Irenaeus presents problems of considerable difficulty in regard to details about Jesus Christ”. Irenaeus is fondly described by the church hierarchy as the “depositary of primitive truth”, but he denied a virgin birth, and never mentioned a trial of Jesus Christ, said nothing of a crucifixion or resurrection and claimed Jesus declined towards old age
2007-03-16 14:27:13 · answer #1 · answered by Boston Bluefish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you ever read the books that weren't considered canonical? I have, and I COMPLETELY understand why they were left out. Like the "gospel" of St Peter for example, in which one of the central characters is a talking cross.
The rest were written too far after the fact, and their author could not be verified as being either one of Christ's disciples, or a disciple of someone close to Christ during His life.
The criteria was NOT questionable. All of the books that are considered to be part of the New Testament canon were written between ten and 60 years after Jesus ascended.
The ones that were written AFTER Revelations (which was written in about 95 AD) were dismissed.
Makes perfect sense.
2007-03-13 08:22:25 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no count the info, no count the ends up of their analyze, the respond will constantly be an identical - that that's a fraud. The essence of religion is which you start up off with an answer, then locate evidence to assist it and forget approximately approximately evidence that is going against it. Do count what share biblical scholars say the bible isn't an precise historic checklist, you will locate 10's or a hundred's of hundreds of thousands of Christians, alongside with maximum it no longer all Evangelicals, which will say in any different case. i'm no longer incorrect - we are asserting an identical element.
2016-10-18 07:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by juart 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are crazy! That tomb discovery has been around since the 80s & archaeologists & historians both think it is a crock.
Hey, when was the book of Phillip written?
How do you know it was edited?
2007-03-13 08:18:29 · answer #4 · answered by Jeff- <3 God <3 people 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
After the Jesus Tomb Documentary do we need to talk facts instead of Media manipulation? even the archeologists that discovered this 'tomb' almost 30 years ago discarded the idea that it was Jesus... and they are non christian scientists...
2007-03-13 08:17:43 · answer #5 · answered by livinintheword † 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is another multi-million Hollywood business. A fictitious idea for business purposes.
2007-03-13 08:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Harvard 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The Book of Phillips was eliminated and we need to find some answers before I give 1 more penny to the bastards, "they eliminated Phil"
2007-03-13 08:22:39 · answer #7 · answered by Saviorsalvado 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
what is that picture of Michael Moore doing on your bathroom ceiling?
2007-03-13 08:17:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
whatever. have a nice day
2007-03-13 08:17:13 · answer #9 · answered by wanda3s48 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋